Vehicle Seat Actuator Beam Layout for Balanced Load Paths

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional vehicle seats are unbalanced, complex, heavy, and costly due to offset actuators and rigid motor assemblies, which limit design freedom and load path optimizations, especially in seats with integrated seat belts that need to absorb high impact forces.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle seat design featuring a lower frame and an upper frame pivotably connected via an actuating assembly with two actuators and a beam structure, allowing floating connections that optimize load paths and enable synchronized electric motors for balanced construction and efficient load distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a single actuator with offset positioning is used to adjust the seat structure, then the actuator can be positioned to achieve adjustment function, but the construction becomes unbalanced and requires torsional stiff frame which increases complexity, cost, and weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat adjustment functionVSAvoidframe construction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by positioning two actuators symmetrically on opposite sides of the seat structure, which balances the load paths and eliminates the need for offset positioning. This symmetric arrangement distributes forces evenly across the frame, reducing torsional stress and allowing for a simpler, lighter frame construction while maintaining full adjustment functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses the concept of counterbalancing by placing actuators on both sides of the seat structure. The actuators work in opposition to each other, with one extending while the other retracts, creating a balanced system that cancels out unbalanced forces and moments on the frame, thereby reducing the required frame stiffness and overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

2Device complexity

If the gearbox and motor assembly are rigidly fixed as part of the load path, then the actuator structure is simplified, but the load path and actuator cannot be individually tuned and design freedom is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator structure simplicityVSAvoidload path optimization freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the actuator system into independent components: the motor assemblies are mounted separately on the seat structure, and the drive shafts connect to the actuators through flexible couplings. This segmentation allows the motor assemblies to be positioned and tuned independently from the load-bearing actuator mechanisms, providing design freedom to optimize both the drive system and the load path separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces flexible couplings as intermediary elements between the motor assemblies and the actuator mechanisms. These couplings serve as mediators that transmit torque while allowing relative movement and misalignment, enabling independent tuning of the motor mounting positions and the actuator load paths without rigid constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If traditional actuator positioning is used, then the seat can be adjusted, but the construction becomes heavy and costly due to the need for torsional stiff frame

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseat adjustabilityVSAvoidvehicle seat weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By positioning actuators symmetrically on opposite sides of the seat structure, the patent creates a balanced system that distributes loads evenly. This eliminates the need for heavy torsional stiffening of the frame, allowing the use of lighter materials and simpler structural design while maintaining full seat adjustability and structural integrity under load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Device complexity

If motors are rigidly fixed in the load path, then the actuator assembly is compact, but design freedom and load path optimizations are limited, especially for integrated seat belts with high impact forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator assembly compactnessVSAvoidimpact force absorption
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the actuator system into independently mounted motor assemblies and separate actuator mechanisms. The motor assemblies are mounted on the seat structure with flexible couplings to the drive shafts, allowing the load paths to be optimized independently. This segmentation enables the design to accommodate high impact forces from integrated seat belts by creating dedicated load-bearing paths that are separate from the motor mounting structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Flexible couplings serve as intermediary elements that decouple the motor assemblies from the load-bearing actuator mechanisms. This allows the motor mounts to be designed for compactness while the actuator load paths can be independently optimized for strength and impact force absorption, particularly important for integrated seat belt systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4166386B1A vehicle seat and a method for operating a vehicle seat
Publication Date: 2025.11.12 NINGBO GEELY AUTOMOBILE RES & DEV CO LTD
  • EP4166386B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4166386B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4166386B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A vehicle seat comprising a lower frame and an upper frame, where the upper frame is pivotably arranged in relation to the lower frame. The upper frame is movably connected to the lower frame via an actuating assembly, where the actuating assembly comprises a first actuator and a second actuator configured to cooperate with each other for displacing the upper frame in relation to the lower frame. The actuating assembly further comprises a beam structure connected to and extending between the first actuator and the second actuator, where the first actuator and the second actuator are floatingly connected to the lower frame via the beam structure.