Vehicle Secure Idle Control via Key Fob Authentication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Securing a vehicle during an extended idle is challenging, especially when multiple keys are not available, and even with multiple keys, ensuring the vehicle's safety through safeguard checks is desirable to prevent unauthorized use or tampering.

Innovation Solution

A control module integrated into the vehicle's system that processes key fob data to determine if secure idle conditions are met, inhibiting vehicle mobility by locking the powertrain and external locks, and ceasing this inhibition when exit conditions are met, while continuously monitoring for safeguard violations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple keys are used to secure the vehicle during extended idle, then vehicle security is improved, but device complexity and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle securityVSAvoidmultiple keys requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a key fob that transmits a copy or representation of the authorization code wirelessly, eliminating the need for multiple physical keys. The control module receives and processes the key fob data to verify authorization, providing security through digital copying rather than multiple physical copies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical key system with a wireless electronic communication system. Instead of inserting physical keys into ignition switches, the system uses radio frequency transmission from the key fob to the control module, substituting mechanical interaction with electromagnetic field-based communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If safeguard checks are continuously performed during extended idle, then vehicle security is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle securityVSAvoidenergy consumption during idle
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control module performs safeguard checks at periodic intervals rather than continuously. The processor is configured to check safeguard conditions during the extended idle period at defined intervals, reducing energy consumption while maintaining security through periodic verification of vehicle status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Ease of operation

If the vehicle transmission is put into park while the engine is running, then vehicle mobility is inhibited, but ease of operation improves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle idling convenienceVSAvoidvehicle security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a control module as an intermediary between the driver's intent and the vehicle's security systems. The control module processes key fob data, determines authorization, and coordinates the activation of security measures during extended idle, mediating between operational convenience and security requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10366554B2Systems and methods for securing a vehicle during extended idle
Publication Date: 2019.07.30 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US10366554B2 patent drawing
  • US10366554B2 patent drawing
  • US10366554B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for an extended secure idle (SI) for a mobile platform. The SI may be entered and exited responsive to a variety of SI entry and SI exit conditions. SI entry and exit conditions include receiving key fob data from a key fob authenticated with the mobile platform. In addition, various predetermined safeguard conditions for scenarios to monitor may be designated a priori. The described system and method will continually check that the predetermined safeguard conditions are not violated during an extended SI.