Automated Vehicle Security Remote with Proximity Unlocking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Remote automotive security systems face issues such as automatic locking causing inconvenience, frequent false alarms, difficulty in identifying alarm sources, lack of control over sensor activation, unawareness of remote start termination, and confusion between vehicles when using multi-vehicle remote controllers.

Innovation Solution

A remote control system with advanced features including a microprocessor-based base system, customizable sensor control, alarm identification, automatic remote start capabilities, and user-friendly interface for configuring and monitoring vehicle functions, along with a user interface that provides visual and auditory feedback to enhance user experience and control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the remote controller automatically locks after a period of inactivity to prevent accidental operation, then security is improved, but user convenience deteriorates as the operator must unlock it before use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of accidental operationVSAvoidconvenience of use
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically unlocking the remote controller when it detects that the operator has approached the vehicle (via proximity sensing or key recognition). This eliminates the need for manual unlocking while maintaining security, as the controller remains locked for others but is automatically unlocked for the authorized user before they can use it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the security system activates all sensors to provide comprehensive protection, then security coverage is improved, but false alarm frequency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidfalse alarm frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by allowing different sensors to have different activation states - some sensors are activated while others are bypassed or disabled based on their location and function. This enables comprehensive security coverage in critical areas while reducing false alarms from sensors prone to malfunction or environmental interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamics by allowing real-time modification of sensor activation status. Users can dynamically enable or disable specific sensors based on current needs, such as disabling vibration sensors when parked on busy streets or enabling them when parked in secure locations, thus adapting security coverage to situational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of information

If the system provides detailed alarm information including sensor identification, then alarm source identification is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm source identificationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies feedback by providing real-time alarm information to the user through the remote controller or in-vehicle display, including identification of which sensor was triggered. This detailed feedback enables quick identification of alarm sources without requiring complex user interpretation, as the system automatically processes and presents the information in an understandable format.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If the remote controller is designed with multiple keys for comprehensive control, then functional capability is improved, but portability and comfort deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol capabilityVSAvoidportability and comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements universality by designing a single remote controller that can control multiple vehicle functions (locking, unlocking, trunk release, panic alarm, remote start) and potentially multiple vehicles. This consolidates what would traditionally require multiple separate controls into one device, maintaining comprehensive control capability while improving portability and comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8378800B2Security system and method for operating the same
Publication Date: 2013.02.19 VOXX INT CORP
  • US8378800B2 patent drawing
  • US8378800B2 patent drawing
  • US8378800B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A security system is disclosed with a digital processor-based wireless remote controller that sends command to perform system operations and receive confirmation of various aspects of the system. The security system monitors environmental and vehicle system parameters and automatically provides commands or prohibits issuance of commands to operate vehicles systems based on preset environmental and vehicle system conditions. The system reports command and response status to users through the remote controller.