Vehicle Security During Refueling to Prevent Sliding Theft

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional vehicle security systems are ineffective in preventing 'sliding' thefts, where thieves exploit the blind side of a vehicle during refueling, as they fail to automatically engage security measures when the driver is momentarily inattentive, making it difficult to detect and deter such quick and stealthy crimes.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle security system that automatically activates when the vehicle is in a refueling state, using sensors to monitor the blind side and initiate window closure and door locking, while allowing the fueling side to remain unaffected, and includes features like occupancy detection and alert notifications to the driver via cell phone, with optional visual and auditory alarms to deter potential threats.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional vehicle security systems are used, then the system structure is simple and easy to operate, but the system fails to detect and prevent sliding thefts during refueling due to lack of automatic activation and blind side monitoring

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The security system automatically activates before the driver can react to a potential threat. Motion sensors detect movement near the blind side and preemptively trigger window closure and door locking, preventing sliding thefts before they occur. This preliminary action resolves the contradiction by maintaining security effectiveness without requiring complex manual intervention from the driver.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Motion sensors and control units act as intermediaries between the external environment and the vehicle's security features. These components automatically detect threats and mediate the activation of protective measures, bridging the gap between simple system operation and advanced security detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the driver manually engages security systems, then the system remains simple and energy-efficient, but the driver cannot respond to sliding thefts that occur during moments of inattentiveness at the blind side

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft prevention capabilityVSAvoiddriver attention requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The security system serves itself by automatically detecting threats and activating protective measures without requiring driver attention or manual intervention. The motion sensors and control units independently monitor the blind side and execute security protocols, allowing the driver to remain focused on refueling while maintaining high theft prevention capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors motion near the vehicle and provides immediate feedback by activating security features when threats are detected. This automatic feedback loop eliminates the need for driver attention while maintaining ease of operation, as the system responds autonomously to detected anomalies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If security features are activated during refueling, then sliding thefts are deterred, but energy consumption increases due to window closure and alarm activation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protectionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The security system operates periodically rather than continuously, activating window closure and alarm features only when motion is detected near the blind side. This on-demand operation provides strong security protection when needed while minimizing energy consumption during normal refueling operations, resolving the contradiction between security reliability and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by closing windows and locking doors before a theft can occur, preventing the need for continuous alarm activation. This proactive approach provides security protection while consuming less energy than continuous alarm operation would require.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS11872955B2Vehicle security system
Publication Date: 2024.01.16 WEBRAM LLC
  • US11872955B2 patent drawing
  • US11872955B2 patent drawing
  • US11872955B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle security system may be automatically activated when a vehicle (e.g., car or truck) is temporarily stopped. Specifically, if a car is stopped at a gas station or other type of temporary stop (e.g., where a car would not be fully closed and locked) the vehicle security system may engage (e.g., based on opening of a gas cap cover). The vehicle security system monitors for theft of contents from inside a vehicle in a temporary stopped state. The vehicle security system may lock different doors based on different conditions. In some cases, only some doors (and not all doors) will be locked. In a temporary stop condition, a vehicle may not be fully locked to engage a standard anti-theft security system. If a driver's attention is diverted during the temporary stopped condition a quick and quiet theft scenario (e.g., a reach and grab) may be attempted.