Vehicle Security Mode for Triggered Threat Detection and Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle security systems lack the ability to autonomously detect and respond to potential security threats in real-time, such as unusual movements or sounds around the vehicle.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle-based security system that includes sensors to detect movements or irregular sounds, analyzes data to determine security threats, and takes action based on messages received from associated devices, such as moving the vehicle or alerting occupants.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sensors continuously monitor the area around the vehicle to detect security threats in real-time, then the detection capability and response time are improved, but the energy consumption and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity threat detection capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-positions sensors around the vehicle and pre-configures detection algorithms to activate only when triggered by specific events (movements or irregular sounds). This allows the vehicle to maintain security readiness without continuous full-power operation, reducing energy consumption while preserving detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of continuous monitoring, the system employs periodic sensing activated by trigger events. Sensors take measurements at intervals or when specific conditions are met (detecting movements or irregular sounds), then enter low-power states between activations. This periodic operation maintains security monitoring capability while significantly reducing overall energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Reliability

If the vehicle enters security mode and collects data from sensors to record the area, then the security monitoring capability is improved, but the device complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity monitoring capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The security system is divided into separate functional modules: sensor arrays for detection, data collection subsystems for recording, analysis components for threat assessment, and communication systems for notifications. Each module operates independently but coordinates through standardized interfaces, making the complex system manageable and maintainable while providing comprehensive security monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor system serves multiple functions: detecting movements, capturing irregular sounds, and potentially other environmental parameters. The same sensor array and data collection infrastructure supports various security modes and threat detection scenarios, reducing overall system complexity by avoiding dedicated hardware for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Extent of automation

If the vehicle autonomously analyzes sensor data to determine security threats and performs actions, then the response speed and automation level are improved, but the computational requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous security responseVSAvoidcomputational system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-loads threat detection algorithms and response protocols into the vehicle's computing system. When security mode is activated, the system immediately applies these pre-configured analytical frameworks to sensor data, enabling rapid autonomous threat assessment and response without requiring complex real-time computation or external processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous security system continuously monitors sensor inputs, analyzes threats, executes responses, and learns from outcomes. Feedback loops allow the system to refine its threat detection accuracy and response effectiveness over time, with the vehicle notifying associated devices of threats and performing actions based on received messages, creating an adaptive automated security ecosystem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250193952A1Vehicle security mode
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA INC
  • US20250193952A1 patent drawing
  • US20250193952A1 patent drawing
  • US20250193952A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An example operation includes one or more of entering, by a vehicle, a security mode, when sensors on the vehicle detect a movement or an irregular sound, collecting data, by the vehicle, from the sensors to record an area proximate the vehicle, analyzing, by the vehicle, the data to determine a security threat, notifying, by the vehicle, a device associated with the vehicle when the security threat is above a threshold, and performing an action, by the vehicle, based on a message received from the device.