Vehicle Sensor Coordinator for Adaptive Mode Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of object detection systems in motor vehicles increases exponentially due to the growing number of driver assistance functions, requiring coordination between multiple sensor systems with different detection ranges and operating modes, leading to inefficiencies in processing relevant object data.

Innovation Solution

A coordinator is introduced to manage object detection sensors by correlating importance density functions from driver assistance functions with detection probability density functions, determining the most suitable operating mode for each assistance function and switching the sensor accordingly, allowing sensors to only operate in modes relevant for their functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple sensor systems with different detection ranges and operating modes are used to cover various driver assistance functions, then the detection capability and coverage area are improved, but the system complexity and coordination difficulty increase exponentially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a coordinator as an intermediary component that manages the object detection sensor and distributes objects to appropriate driver assistance functions. The coordinator receives objects from the sensor, evaluates their relevance to different functions using importance density functions, and distributes them accordingly. This mediator approach resolves the complexity by centralizing the coordination logic, preventing exponential growth in coordination difficulty while maintaining versatile detection capabilities across multiple operating modes and driver assistance functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the object detection sensor operates in multiple operating modes with different detection ranges, then the versatility and coverage are improved, but the processing efficiency and data relevance are worsened due to unnecessary data processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating mode versatilityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different importance density functions to different driver assistance functions, where each function has a customized importance profile tailored to its specific needs. For example, long-range functions like adaptive cruise control have importance density concentrated at larger distances, while short-range functions like emergency braking have importance density concentrated at smaller distances. This allows the system to process only the most relevant objects for each function, improving processing efficiency while maintaining the ability to operate in multiple modes with different detection ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If driver assistance functions access the object detection sensor directly without coordination, then the access flexibility is improved, but the coordination overhead and computational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess flexibilityVSAvoidcoordination overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The coordinator serves as a centralized intermediary that manages all access to the object detection sensor. Instead of allowing direct uncoordinated access from multiple driver assistance functions, the coordinator receives objects from the sensor, evaluates their relevance to each function using importance density functions, and distributes them accordingly. This approach maintains access flexibility for all functions while reducing coordination overhead by centralizing the evaluation and distribution logic in a single component, avoiding the exponential complexity that would arise from direct peer-to-peer coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP1932016B1Method and device for controlling at least one object detection sensor
Publication Date: 2009.04.15 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP1932016B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP1932016B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b
  • EP1932016B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The invention relates to a method and device for controlling at least one object-detecting sensor for a motor vehicle, wherein at least one sensor is switchable between several operation modes, several functions for evaluating the objects detected by the object-detecting sensor can optionally access to at least one sensor, a switching between operating modes is selected according to the actual accessing function, a co-ordinator is provided between the function evaluation device and at least one sensor, each function accessing to at least one sensor transmits respectively an important density function to the co-ordinator, at least one sensor transmits a detection probability function to the co-ordinator for each activateable operating mode and the co-ordinator selects the operating mode adapted to each function accessing to at least one sensor.