Autonomous Vehicle Sensor Fusion Against Jamming Attacks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles are vulnerable to jamming attacks that disrupt sensors, leading to potential accidents and safety threats, as demonstrated by successful experiments where LiDAR systems were jammed, causing objects to disappear, resulting in dangerous situations.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that utilizes multiple vehicle sensors to detect the presence of an object after it is no longer detected by one sensor, triggering safety measures such as alerts and manual control switches, and employs machine learning and AI to predict object trajectories and mitigate jamming attacks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single sensor is used to detect objects for autonomous vehicle navigation, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of object detection deteriorates when subjected to jamming attacks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor system complexityVSAvoidobject detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the detection task across multiple sensor types (LiDAR, radar, cameras, ultrasonic sensors) rather than relying on a single sensor. Each sensor independently monitors for objects, and the system integrates their outputs to maintain reliable detection even when one sensor is jammed. This segmentation allows the system to tolerate sensor failures while maintaining overall detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters by switching between different sensor modalities based on detection needs. When LiDAR is jammed, the system transitions to using radar or camera-based detection, effectively changing the detection parameter from optical range-finding to electromagnetic wave reflection or image processing, thereby maintaining detection reliability under adversarial conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple sensors are deployed to detect objects and mitigate jamming attacks, then the reliability of object detection is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection reliabilityVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements multi-functionality by using a unified object detection framework that processes inputs from multiple sensor types through a common neural network architecture. The same detection model handles data from LiDAR, radar, cameras, and ultrasonic sensors, allowing the system to maintain reliability across different sensor modalities without proportionally increasing processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates virtual copies of detection capabilities across different sensor modalities. Instead of implementing separate detection systems for each sensor type, it uses the same detection algorithm and object representation methods across LiDAR, radar, camera, and ultrasonic inputs, thereby managing complexity through algorithmic reuse rather than separate processing pipelines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If safety actions are triggered based on multiple sensor confirmation, then the safety of occupants and pedestrians is improved, but the loss of time in response to actual hazards increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety action reliabilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection and validation using multiple sensors before triggering safety actions. By continuously monitoring objects with redundant sensor inputs and pre-validating their presence through cross-sensor correlation, the system reduces false positives while maintaining rapid response capability. The preliminary action is the cross-verification process that occurs continuously in the background, ready to trigger immediate safety responses when confirmed hazards are detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250323751A1Identification and mitigation of jamming attacks on autonomous vehicles
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 KYNDRYL INC
  • US20250323751A1 patent drawing
  • US20250323751A1 patent drawing
  • US20250323751A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments relate to the identification and mitigation of jamming attacks on autonomous vehicles. A technique includes determining that an object previously detected is no longer detected by a sensor of a vehicle. The technique includes, in response to the object previously detected no longer being detected by the sensor, determining that another sensor of the vehicle detects the object. The technique includes, in response to the object previously detected no longer being detected by the sensor, performing safety actions based on another sensor detecting the object.