Autonomous Vehicle Sensor Fusion for Fault-Tolerant Object Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sensor fusion systems for identifying external objects in autonomous driving face challenges when errors occur in individual sensors, leading to inaccurate object identification.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control apparatus utilizing a first sensor (camera) and a second sensor (LiDAR) with a processor that employs multiple neural network models to analyze images and point clouds, determining similarity values and generating control signals for autonomous driving based on the outputs of these sensors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If sensor fusion is used to determine external objects using camera and LiDAR, then measurement precision is improved, but reliability deteriorates when an error occurs in one sensor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject identification accuracyVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the object identification process into separate processing paths for camera data and LiDAR data, each with its own neural network model. This segmentation allows independent error handling and fallback mechanisms, where if one sensor fails, the other can still provide identification results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the processing parameters based on sensor status. When one sensor is detected to have an error, the system adjusts by relying more heavily on the other sensor's data and modifies the fusion strategy accordingly, maintaining reliability while preserving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple neural network models are used to process camera and LiDAR data, then object identification accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject identification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs neural network models that can process multiple types of input data (camera images and LiDAR point clouds) through a unified architecture. This multi-functionality reduces the need for entirely separate processing systems, thereby managing complexity while maintaining high identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary fusion module that coordinates between the camera processing path and LiDAR processing path. This mediator manages the complexity by standardizing the integration of results from multiple neural networks, making the overall system more manageable despite having multiple models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If sensor data fusion is implemented to ensure accurate object identification, then reliability is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject identification reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing of camera and LiDAR data separately through dedicated neural network models before fusion. This preliminary action prepares the data in advance, allowing faster fusion and decision-making when needed, thus reducing overall processing time while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a hierarchical fusion strategy where critical identification tasks use full sensor fusion for high reliability, while less critical tasks can rely on partial fusion or single-sensor data. This selective approach reduces average processing time while maintaining reliability for important decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260011130A1Vehicle control apparatus and method thereof
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20260011130A1 patent drawing
  • US20260011130A1 patent drawing
  • US20260011130A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for controlling autonomous driving of a vehicle is introduced. The apparatus may comprise a first sensor configured to capture an image and a second sensor configured to acquire a cluster of points. The apparatus may further comprise a memory storing multiple neural network models and a processor configured to process data from the sensors. The processor obtains a first value, indicating a score for the type of a point associated with the second sensor, by inputting the image to a first neural network model. The processor also obtains a second value, indicating a score for the same type, by inputting the cluster of points to a second neural network model. Using these values, the processor determines a similarity value among points in the cluster. Based on this similarity value, the apparatus outputs a selected value, generates a signal, and subsequently controls the vehicle's autonomous driving.