Autonomous Vehicle Sensor Failure Detection via Inclination Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous vehicles face difficulties in determining sensor failures without using special inspection apparatuses, making it challenging to ensure safety when posture detection or inclination detection sensors become out of order.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating distance measurement means, inclination calculation means, posture calculation means, and failure determination means within the vehicle to compare calculated inclinations and detect sensor failures, allowing for safe operation without special inspection apparatuses, including control mechanisms to decelerate and stop the vehicle when failures are detected.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If special inspection apparatus is used to determine sensor failures, then measurement precision of sensor status is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor failure detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection apparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous vehicle uses its own existing sensors (distance measurement means and posture calculation means) to detect failures in its own sensor system. The failure determination means compares inclination data from both sources to self-diagnose sensor malfunctions, eliminating the need for external inspection apparatus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The distance measurement means and posture calculation means, originally designed for navigation and obstacle detection, are also utilized for failure detection purposes. This multi-functional use of existing components avoids adding dedicated inspection equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If multiple sensors are added for failure detection, then reliability of failure determination is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure determination reliabilityVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reuses existing sensors (distance measurement means for obstacle detection and posture calculation means with angular speed/acceleration sensors for navigation) for the additional function of failure detection. No dedicated failure detection sensors are added.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The failure determination means continuously compares inclination data from the distance measurement means with data from the posture calculation means. This feedback mechanism enables real-time failure detection without adding hardware, by monitoring consistency between redundant measurement sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If special inspection apparatus is used to determine sensor failures, then measurement precision of sensor status is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor failure detection accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle performs self-diagnosis using its own existing sensor system, eliminating the need for expensive external inspection apparatus. The failure determination is achieved through software-based comparison of data from existing sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual model of vehicle inclination through calculation based on distance measurements, and compares it with physical sensor readings. This computational approach replaces the need for physical inspection equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If distance measurement means is disposed in direction oblique to road surface, then measurement precision of obstacle distance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection precisionVSAvoidsensor arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The distance measurement means is positioned at a specific location on the vehicle body and oriented at a specific oblique angle to detect obstacles in particular directions. This localized, directional placement optimizes obstacle detection capability without requiring a complex array of sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9268335B2Autonomous vehicle and its failure determination method
Publication Date: 2016.02.23 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US9268335B2 patent drawing
  • US9268335B2 patent drawing
  • US9268335B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous vehicle comprises at least one distance measurement means for measuring a distance to a road surface disposed in a vehicle main body, inclination calculation means for calculating an inclination of the vehicle main body based on the distance measured by the distance measurement means, posture calculation means including a sensor that detects at least one of an angular speed and an acceleration of the vehicle main body, the posture calculation means being configured to calculate the inclination of the vehicle main body based on a sensor value detected by the sensor, and failure determination means for determining a failure in each distance measurement means and the posture calculation means by comparing the inclination of the vehicle main body calculated by the inclination calculation means with the inclination of the vehicle main body calculated by the posture calculation means.