Vehicle Sensor Rules Engine for Automated Maintenance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional vehicle maintenance systems require manual intervention and delayed responses to issues detected by sensors, leading to potential accidents and increased costs due to procrastination or ignorance of problems.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that uses sensor data to determine the state of vehicle components and applies predefined rules to automatically initiate actions, such as repairs or notifications, without explicit user authorization for certain threshold-based tasks, thereby reducing the need for additional user input and expediting issue resolution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual intervention and user authorization are required for each maintenance action, then user control and decision-making authority are maintained, but response time increases and processing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUser control over maintenance actionsVSAvoidResponse time for maintenance issues
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically initiating maintenance tasks based on pre-configured rules and thresholds. When sensor data indicates a component is below its operational threshold, the system automatically creates and executes maintenance actions without waiting for user authorization, thereby reducing response time while maintaining user control through prior rule configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the vehicle maintenance system to autonomously monitor its own components, detect issues, and initiate repairs without external intervention. The rules engine continuously evaluates sensor data and automatically triggers maintenance actions when conditions are met, making the system self-sufficient in routine maintenance operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If explicit user authorization is required for each action, then user awareness and informed decision-making are ensured, but system complexity and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUser awareness of maintenance actionsVSAvoidAuthorization processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Users perform preliminary authorization by configuring maintenance thresholds and action preferences in advance. The system then uses these pre-established parameters to automatically make decisions without requiring real-time user input, reducing processing complexity while maintaining user control over the decision-making framework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by notifying users of maintenance actions taken and current component states. This continuous feedback loop keeps users informed of system status and actions performed, maintaining user awareness without requiring constant active engagement or complex real-time authorization processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If traditional regular inspections are performed, then comprehensive system monitoring is achieved, but time consumption and resource expenditure increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSystem monitoring coverageVSAvoidMaintenance efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves continuous monitoring of vehicle components through persistent sensor data collection and real-time rule evaluation. Instead of periodic inspections, the system continuously tracks component states and immediately detects when thresholds are breached, providing uninterrupted monitoring coverage while improving response time and maintenance efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual inspection processes with automated electronic monitoring. Sensors continuously collect data on component states, and the rules engine automatically evaluates this data against maintenance criteria, substituting human-driven periodic inspections with automated continuous monitoring that is both more comprehensive and more efficient

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10977881B1Rules based analysis of vehicle sensor data for actions
Publication Date: 2021.04.13 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (USAA)
  • US10977881B1 patent drawing
  • US10977881B1 patent drawing
  • US10977881B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are described for determining and performing actions associated with a vehicle based on an analysis of sensor data that describes a state of component(s) of the vehicle. Sensor data is generated by sensor(s) on a vehicle and/or external to the vehicle. The sensor data is analyzed to determine a current state of vehicle component(s), such as whether a component is damaged or otherwise in need of repair or maintenance. The analysis of the sensor data may be performed by a rules engine that applies a set of rules indicating what action(s) are to be performed based on certain detected states of the vehicle component(s) indicated by the sensor data. The rule(s) may also indicate instances in which action(s) can be performed automatically or autonomously in response to detecting vehicle component state(s), or whether authorization is to be requested from an owner, operator, or other individual associated with the vehicle.