Vehicle Service Pricing Platform with Vendor Aggregation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicle owners face challenges in selecting the most suitable and cost-effective repair services due to incomplete data and lack of comprehensive information about available vendors, making it difficult to diagnose and address vehicle issues efficiently.

Innovation Solution

A pricing service provider system that determines vehicle service needs, contacts multiple vendors for pricing data, and provides operators with detailed information including vendor ratings, distance, and availability, utilizing vehicle performance data for diagnosis and facilitating a reverse auction process to reduce repair costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If vehicle operators manually search for service vendors using traditional methods (yellow pages, internet searches, referrals), then they can find some vendor options, but the process is time-consuming and the information obtained is incomplete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of vendor informationVSAvoidtime to select vendor
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically collecting and organizing vendor information, service capabilities, pricing data, and availability status before the operator needs to make a selection. The monitoring service pre-processes vehicle diagnostic data to identify service needs, and the pricing service provider pre-gathers quotes from multiple vendors, so when the operator needs to select a vendor, all necessary information is already prepared and presented in a comparative format.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary system comprising a monitoring service and a pricing service provider that acts as a mediator between the vehicle operator and multiple service vendors. This intermediary automatically queries vendors for pricing and availability information, aggregates the data, and presents it to the operator, eliminating the need for the operator to manually contact each vendor while ensuring complete and up-to-date information is provided.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If vehicle operators rely on incomplete data from traditional vendor selection methods, then the vendor selection process is simpler, but the ability to diagnose and address vehicle issues efficiently is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of vehicle service selectionVSAvoidcompleteness of diagnostic data
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where the monitoring service continuously monitors vehicle operational data and fault codes, automatically diagnoses service needs based on this feedback, and uses the diagnostic results to query appropriate vendors for pricing. The pricing service provider then feeds back pricing and availability information to the operator, creating a closed-loop system where diagnostic information directly informs vendor selection, ensuring both complete diagnostic data and high efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring service performs preliminary diagnostic actions by analyzing vehicle operational data and fault codes to identify specific service needs before vendor selection begins. This preliminary diagnosis ensures that when vendors are queried, the request is specific and informed, allowing operators to efficiently select vendors based on accurate diagnostic information rather than guessing or using incomplete data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If the system contacts multiple vendors to obtain comprehensive pricing data, then the operator receives more complete pricing information, but the complexity of the service selection system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of pricing informationVSAvoidcomplexity of pricing service system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pricing service provider is designed as a universal platform that handles multiple functions: querying different types of vendors (repair shops, service centers, mobile service providers), aggregating pricing data from various sources, standardizing the information format, and presenting it in a unified comparative display. This multi-functional design allows the system to contact multiple vendors with diverse capabilities while maintaining a single, manageable interface for the operator, reducing the perceived complexity despite the comprehensive vendor network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The pricing service provider acts as an intermediary that simplifies the complexity of contacting multiple vendors by absorbing the communication burden. Instead of the operator directly managing multiple vendor interactions, the intermediary automatically queries vendors, receives their responses, standardizes the information, and presents it in a simplified comparative format. This intermediary layer hides the system complexity from the operator while maintaining complete pricing information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of manufacture

If traditional vendor selection methods are used, then the system complexity is lower, but the cost-effectiveness of vehicle repair services is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of service selection systemVSAvoidcost-effectiveness of repair services
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically gathering pricing information from multiple vendors before the operator makes a selection. The monitoring service pre-identifies service needs through diagnostic analysis, and the pricing service provider pre-queries multiple vendors for quotes, allowing the operator to make an informed, cost-effective decision without manually contacting each vendor. This preliminary data collection ensures cost-effectiveness while the automated process maintains simplicity for the operator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The pricing service provider serves as an intermediary that enables cost-effective repairs by automatically comparing prices from multiple vendors and presenting the information in a simplified format. This intermediary absorbs the complexity of multi-vendor negotiations and price comparisons, maintaining ease of use for the operator while ensuring the selection is cost-effective through comprehensive price data from multiple sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12125082B2System and method for obtaining competitive pricing for vehicle services
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 ZONAR SYSTEMS INC
  • US12125082B2 patent drawing
  • US12125082B2 patent drawing
  • US12125082B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In order to obtain competitive pricing for vehicle servicing, a pricing service provider is used to obtain pricing data from a plurality of service vendors. In at least some embodiments, one or more of the following types of additional information for each vendor will be provided along with the pricing data, to enable the consumer (the owner or operator of the vehicle) to make an informed selection: a rating of the vendor, a relative distance between the consumer (or known vehicle location) and the vendor, and a time period defining when the vendor will be able to accommodate the service. In at least some embodiments, a pricing service provider hosts a reverse auction for the benefit of the consumer. In at least some embodiment, the pricing service provider hosts a webpage upon which results of the service requests from the plurality of vendors are displayed.