Vehicle Signal Object Integrity Detection Using Map-Guided Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for monitoring signal object integrity in roadways are labor-intensive, unpredictable, and often untimely, leading to compromised safety and efficiency due to undetected damage or obstruction of signal objects.

Innovation Solution

Automated vehicles equipped with sensors and processing circuitry identify and report signal object damage by comparing high-definition maps with real-time observations, using classifiers to determine the type and degree of damage, and communicate results to maintenance authorities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual monitoring methods are used to check signal object integrity, then labor costs and time consumption increase, but detection capability and response timeliness remain insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal object integrity detection capabilityVSAvoidresponse time for signal object maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection methods with automated optical sensing systems. Image-capture sensors mounted on vehicles automatically detect and classify signal objects, substituting human labor with machine-based optical detection to improve both detection precision and response timeliness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service monitoring where vehicles automatically capture images, process sensor data through neural networks, identify signal objects, assess their integrity, and report findings without human intervention. This automated self-monitoring eliminates the need for dedicated manual inspection resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive sensor coverage is implemented to detect all signal objects, then detection accuracy improves, but system complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal object recognition accuracyVSAvoidsensor system and processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex detection task into distinct processing stages: image capture by sensors, preliminary processing of sensor data, neural network-based object identification, integrity assessment, and result reporting. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while managing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces map data as an intermediary reference to verify detected signal objects. By comparing sensor data against known map information, the system improves recognition accuracy while using the map data as a mediating layer to reduce false positives and validate detections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4020406B1Vehicle-based measurement of signal object integrity
Publication Date: 2026.05.06 INTEL CORP
  • EP4020406B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4020406B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4020406B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

System and techniques for vehicle-based measurement of signal object integrity are described herein. Sensor data of an environment of the vehicle is obtained. A bound for the sensor data for the sensor data is also obtained. Here, the bound corresponds to a signal object (e.g., sign, light, road marking, etc.). A classifier for the signal object is invoked on the sensor data based on the bound. If the classifier produces a result that indicates a problem with the signal object, a representation of the result is communicated.