Vehicle Software Deployment System with Fallback Plans

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern vehicles with multiple electronic control units (ECUs) and sensors face challenges in optimizing software deployment due to varying system configurations and component failures, leading to sub-optimal resource utilization and potential application degradation or failure.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle software deployment system that generates optimized deployment plans and fallback plans using telemetry data and customer preferences, prioritizing resource allocation and ensuring certification, while automatically adapting to changes in vehicle configurations and failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If vehicle software applications are deployed to vehicles with multiple ECUs and sensors, then the applications can function with various system configurations, but the resource utilization may be sub-optimal and deployment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment configuration flexibilityVSAvoiddeployment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-determines fallback deployment plans before actual deployment occurs. Multiple potential deployment configurations are prepared in advance, including optimized plans and fallback plans for various failure scenarios. When deployment time arrives, the system selects from pre-computed options rather than computing deployment strategies in real-time, reducing operational complexity while maintaining adaptability across different vehicle configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If vehicle components may fail, then reliability concerns arise, but implementing comprehensive failure handling increases system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication operability under failure conditionsVSAvoidfailure handling mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-computes fallback deployment plans for various failure scenarios before actual failures occur. Multiple failure modes are simulated in advance, and corresponding remedial deployment configurations are prepared and stored. When a failure actually occurs, the system simply selects the pre-computed fallback plan that matches the failure condition, avoiding the need for complex real-time failure analysis and computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements redundancy by preparing multiple deployment plans including optimized plans and fallback plans for different failure scenarios. This cushioning approach ensures that when component failures occur, the system can switch to pre-prepared alternative configurations, maintaining application operability without requiring complex adaptive failure handling mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If multiple deployment plans are generated for different failure scenarios, then reliability improves, but the time required for deployment planning increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment robustnessVSAvoiddeployment planning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs computationally intensive deployment planning and failure scenario simulation in advance, before actual deployment operations. Multiple failure scenarios are pre-simulated and corresponding fallback plans are pre-computed and stored. During actual deployment, the system only needs to select from pre-computed options rather than performing complex optimization in real-time, significantly reducing deployment execution time while maintaining comprehensive failure coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12254310B2Vehicle application deployment system with pre-determined fallback deployments
Publication Date: 2025.03.18 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12254310B2 patent drawing
  • US12254310B2 patent drawing
  • US12254310B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for providing vehicle software deployment plans that include one or more fallback deployment plans are disclosed. In some embodiments, a vehicle software deployment system determines a deployment plan for deploying one or more software applications one or more electronic control units (ECUs) of a vehicle. Additionally, for one or more failure scenarios, the vehicle software deployment system determines one or more respective fallback deployment plans, such as a deployment plan that assumes one of the ECUs of the vehicle has failed. A deployment plan bundle is provided to the vehicle, comprising a primary deployment plan as well as the one or more fallback deployment plans. In the event that one of the failure scenarios takes place with respect to the vehicle, a deployment agent of the vehicle automatically deploys one of the fallback deployment plans that was provided with the deployment bundle.