Vehicle-Specific Incentive Pricing for Demand Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Demand response programs face challenges in effectively incentivizing electric vehicles to participate in demand response events, as existing methods do not maximize participation and profit for vehicle manufacturers and users, leading to suboptimal energy consumption reduction and revenue distribution.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that determine vehicle-specific incentive price ranges for electric vehicles, allowing for the selection of vehicles to form a subgroup that maximizes participation and profit in demand response events by offering varying incentives based on individual vehicle profiles, ensuring alignment with utility company incentives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a uniform incentive amount is provided to all vehicles, then the implementation is simple, but participation is not maximized and profit distribution is suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticipation rateVSAvoidincentive distribution system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements vehicle-specific incentive pricing by determining individual incentive price ranges for each vehicle based on their unique DR profiles, battery capacity, and historical behavior. This local differentiation maximizes participation and profit for each vehicle rather than applying a uniform incentive structure to all vehicles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts incentive amounts based on real-time factors including current battery state of charge, projected state of charge at DR event completion, vehicle usage patterns, and market conditions. This dynamic pricing allows the system to adapt to changing conditions and optimize participation rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If incentive amounts are optimized for each vehicle, then profit and participation are maximized, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue distributionVSAvoidvehicle selection algorithm
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-determining incentive price ranges for each vehicle before DR events occur. Historical data is analyzed and stored in advance to establish baseline incentive structures, which are then adjusted in real-time based on current conditions. This reduces the computational complexity during actual DR events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary selection algorithm that acts as a mediator between the utility company's DR requirements and individual vehicle characteristics. This algorithm processes multiple vehicle profiles and incentive offers, selecting optimal participants while simplifying the overall system coordination and maximizing revenue distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of energy

If more vehicles are selected for DR events, then energy consumption reduction is maximized, but the incentive cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumption reductionVSAvoidincentive amount
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes key parameters including incentive price ranges, battery state of charge thresholds, and vehicle selection criteria to optimize the balance between energy reduction and incentive costs. By adjusting these parameters based on market conditions and DR event requirements, the system maximizes energy consumption reduction while controlling incentive expenditures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10867315B2System and method for implementing a demand response event with variable incentives for vehicles
Publication Date: 2020.12.15 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US10867315B2 patent drawing
  • US10867315B2 patent drawing
  • US10867315B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for implementing a demand response (DR) event includes receiving a demand request (DR) signal for the DR event, determining a vehicle specific incentive price range for each vehicle of a group of vehicles, and selecting vehicles from the group of vehicles to form a subgroup of vehicles. The subgroup of vehicles maximize a number of vehicles participating in the DR event and maximize a profit of each vehicle in the subgroup of vehicles based on the vehicle specific incentive price range for each vehicle in the group of vehicles, subject to the DR incentive amount. The DR signal is transmitted to each vehicle in the subgroup of vehicles.