Vehicle Speed Control Adapting to Road Grade and Traffic Density

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle speed control systems face challenges in optimizing energy efficiency without advance knowledge of road grade variations and in minimizing their impact on surrounding traffic flow, especially in varying traffic conditions.

Innovation Solution

A speed control system that adjusts vehicle speed based on a control policy, using a road grade estimator and traffic density estimator to generate periodic speed adjustments, adopting a constant speed in heavy traffic and varying speed offsets in lighter conditions to minimize disruption to traffic flow and optimize fuel economy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If variable speed offsets are applied to optimize fuel economy, then energy efficiency is improved, but impact on surrounding traffic flow increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel economyVSAvoidimpact on traffic flow
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the speed offset parameter based on traffic density conditions. When traffic density is low, larger speed offsets are applied to optimize fuel economy. When traffic density increases, the speed offsets are reduced or eliminated to minimize disruption to traffic flow. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction by adjusting the degree of speed variation according to environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The speed control system transitions from static constant-speed cruise control to dynamic variable-speed control that adapts to real-time traffic conditions. The controller continuously monitors traffic density and adjusts the speed profile accordingly, enabling the system to optimize fuel economy when conditions permit while maintaining traffic compatibility when conditions require it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Use of energy by moving object

If aggressive speed fluctuations are used to maximize efficiency improvement, then fuel consumption is reduced, but traffic flow disruption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidtraffic flow continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system modifies the amplitude of speed fluctuations based on traffic density parameters. In light traffic conditions, aggressive speed variations are permitted to maximize fuel savings. In heavy traffic conditions, the system reduces fluctuation amplitude to maintain traffic flow continuity. This dynamic parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction between efficiency gain and productivity maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If constant speed control is used in heavy traffic, then traffic flow stability is maintained, but fuel economy optimization is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic flow stabilityVSAvoidfuel economy
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between constant-speed mode and variable-speed mode based on traffic density. In heavy traffic conditions, constant speed control maintains stability. In lighter traffic conditions, variable speed offsets enable fuel economy optimization. This dynamic mode switching resolves the contradiction by selecting the appropriate control strategy for current conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller periodically evaluates traffic density conditions and adjusts the speed control strategy accordingly. This periodic assessment enables the system to transition between constant-speed and variable-speed modes, capturing fuel economy opportunities when traffic conditions permit while maintaining stability when conditions require it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS8930115B2Efficiency-based speed control with traffic-compatible speed offsets
Publication Date: 2015.01.06 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US8930115B2 patent drawing
  • US8930115B2 patent drawing
  • US8930115B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Vehicle apparatus includes a speed control for adjusting a vehicle powertrain of the vehicle in response to a speed setpoint. A grade estimator determines a road grade of a roadway where the vehicle is traveling. A traffic density estimator determines a density of traffic traveling on the roadway in the vicinity of the vehicle. An optimizer executes a selected control policy to periodically generate speed adjustments for applying to the speed setpoint to operate the vehicle powertrain at increased efficiency. The control policy is based on a value function providing an optimized solution for a cost model responsive to the determined road grade to generate an initial speed offset. The optimizer reduces the initial speed offset in proportion to the determined traffic density to generate the speed adjustments. The system minimizes negative impacts to overall traffic flow as well as any negative contribution to reduced fuel efficiency of surrounding traffic.