Vehicle Speed Control System for Transitory Limits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle control systems face inefficiencies due to the need for manual intervention when speed limits change, particularly with transitory speed limits, leading to unnecessary delays and reduced automatic control time, especially when slow orders expire during long trips.

Innovation Solution

A control system that determines the status of transitory speed limits and automatically adjusts operational settings to ensure compliance, generating new trip plans to optimize speed and arrival times, thereby reducing manual intervention and increasing automatic control time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If the vehicle system travels through multiple route segments with transitory speed limits over long distances, then the vehicle must frequently adjust speeds to comply with speed limits, but manual intervention is required when slow orders expire, leading to unnecessary delays and reduced automatic control time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic control timeVSAvoiddelays due to manual intervention
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control system automatically monitors the expiration status of slow orders and self-adjusts operational settings without requiring manual operator intervention. The system queries the status of transitory speed limits, determines expiration automatically, and switches speed limits autonomously, enabling the vehicle system to serve itself in managing speed compliance throughout the trip.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control system continuously queries the status of transitory speed limits and receives feedback about expiration. This feedback mechanism allows the system to detect when a slow order has expired and automatically adjust the speed limit accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that maintains optimal automatic control time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the control system manually monitors and adjusts speed limits for each route segment, then speed compliance can be maintained, but operator workload increases and automatic control time is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed limit complianceVSAvoidoperator workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs self-monitoring of slow order expiration status and self-adjusts speed limits automatically. This eliminates the need for operators to manually track and respond to speed limit changes, significantly reducing operator workload while maintaining reliable speed compliance through automated enforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control system proactively queries the status of transitory speed limits before they expire and prepares speed adjustments in advance. This preliminary action ensures smooth transitions between speed limits without requiring reactive manual intervention, maintaining compliance while reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the vehicle system maintains automatic control throughout the entire trip, then operational efficiency is maximized, but the system may not respond appropriately to expiring slow orders without manual intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidresponse to speed limit changes
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control system maintains automatic control while incorporating continuous feedback queries about slow order expiration status. This feedback loop enables the system to adapt automatically to changing speed limit conditions, responding appropriately to expiring slow orders without breaking automatic control mode, thus preserving both productivity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts its behavior based on the expiration status of slow orders. It automatically switches between different speed limits and operational modes in response to real-time conditions, enabling the system to remain adaptable to changing requirements while maintaining continuous automatic control and maximizing operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12195059B2Vehicle control system
Publication Date: 2025.01.14 TRANSPORTATION IP HOLDINGS LLC
  • US12195059B2 patent drawing
  • US12195059B2 patent drawing
  • US12195059B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system includes a controller that may determine whether a second speed limit, which is less than or equal to a first speed limit, is in effect for a segment of the route. The controller may switch one or more operational settings of a vehicle from the first speed limit to the second speed limit, and may operate the vehicle at the first speed limit outside of the segment of the route and operate the vehicle at or below the second speed limit while the vehicle is approaching or within the segment of the route.