Vehicle Speed Control for Curves Beyond Sensor Range

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vehicle control systems fail to ensure safety when obstacles outside the detection range of external environment sensors, particularly on curved routes, leading to potential hazards.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control device that calculates a target speed using a first speed for stopping before the sensor's range and a second speed for following the route, selecting the minimum speed from these calculations to ensure safe travel and obstacle avoidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the vehicle travels at a higher speed on curved routes, then productivity is improved, but safety deteriorates due to undetected obstacles outside sensor range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle speedVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations of the first speed (based on sensor detection range and stopping distance) and second speed (based on curve geometry and friction) before the vehicle enters the curve. The target speed is determined in advance by comparing these two calculated speeds, ensuring safety constraints are met before high-speed travel begins

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively counteracts potential safety risks by calculating speed limits that prevent the vehicle from traveling faster than what can be safely stopped within sensor range or navigated through curves. This preliminary anti-action establishes speed constraints before hazardous conditions can develop

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Reliability

If the vehicle speed is reduced to ensure safety, then safety is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to slower travel

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidvehicle speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the target speed parameter based on real-time conditions by changing the calculation parameters (sensor range, friction coefficient, curve radius) and selecting the appropriate speed constraint (first or second speed) that satisfies both safety and efficiency requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the target speed is set based on sensor range and curve geometry, then safety is improved, but device complexity increases due to multiple speed calculations

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The speed control function is segmented into two independent calculation paths: first speed calculation (based on sensor range and stopping distance) and second speed calculation (based on curve geometry and friction). This segmentation allows each calculation to focus on specific safety aspects, making the overall system more manageable and transparent

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances vehicle safety by preventing collisions with undetected obstacles and maintaining stable vehicle control on curved routes.

Implementation Method 1

a frictional force received by a host vehicle in a direction opposite to a centrifugal force when the host vehicle travels on a curve is larger than the centrifugal force received by the host vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a centrifugal force received by the host vehicle when the host vehicle travels on the curve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS12534069B2Vehicle control device
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 ASTEMO LTD
  • US12534069B2 patent drawing
  • US12534069B2 patent drawing
  • US12534069B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a vehicle control device capable of improving safety of a vehicle. A vehicle control device according to the present disclosure includes a target speed calculation unit 126 that calculates a target speed of a vehicle. The target speed calculation unit 126 includes a first speed calculation unit 126a, a second speed calculation unit 126b, and a target speed setting unit 126f. The first speed calculation unit 126a calculates, by using a friction coefficient of a road surface and a route length of a target route to an outer edge of a sensing range of an external environment sensor of the vehicle, a first speed at which the vehicle can stop at a stop position before the outer edge. The second speed calculation unit 126b calculates, by using a curvature radius of the target route of the vehicle and the friction coefficient, a second speed at which the vehicle can follow the target route. The target speed setting unit 126f selects the minimum speed of the first speed and the second speed, and sets the minimum speed as the target speed.