Connected Vehicle Standoff Resolution via Causality Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Intelligent transportation systems (ITS) face challenges in resolving standoffs between vehicles, particularly in high-volume areas, due to a lack of coordination and overreliance on operators, leading to increased traffic congestion and frustration.

Innovation Solution

A control system that forms a connected vehicle network, using a happens-before relationship analysis to identify the cause of a standoff and generate mitigation plans, including vehicle actions to resolve the standoff, by sharing information and adapting solutions based on prior experiences through a machine learning model.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If vehicles use peer-to-peer communication to form a connected vehicle network, then information sharing between vehicles is improved, but the time to generate standoff solutions is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation sharing between vehiclesVSAvoidtime to generate standoff solutions
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes communication protocols and data sharing frameworks before standoffs occur. Vehicles continuously exchange basic information (position, speed, trajectory) through the connected vehicle network, so that when a standoff situation arises, the foundational information structure is already in place, eliminating the need to build communication infrastructure from scratch during the critical resolution phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of information sharing and processing based on the standoff situation. During normal operation, vehicles share information at a baseline level. When a standoff is detected, the system intensifies information exchange specifically related to the standoff parameters, focusing computational resources on the critical decision-making data rather than maintaining constant full-spectrum communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If the control system uses causality relationship analysis with happens-before relationships, then the accuracy of identifying right of way is improved, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of identifying right of wayVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a dedicated analysis module that acts as an intermediary between raw sensor data and decision-making processes. This module specifically handles causality relationship analysis by processing happens-before relationships between events (such as vehicle arrivals, right-of-way signals, and maneuver initiations). By isolating this complex analytical function in a specialized component, the system achieves high precision in right-of-way identification without distributing complexity across the entire vehicle control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If the control system automatically detects standoffs and generates mitigation plans, then the productivity of resolving standoffs is improved, but the extent of automation increases system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of resolving standoffsVSAvoidlevel of automated decision-making
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The automated standoff resolution system is divided into distinct functional modules: detection module (identifies standoff conditions), analysis module (evaluates causality and right-of-way), planning module (generates mitigation strategies), and execution module (implements vehicle maneuvers). Each module handles a specific aspect of the resolution process, allowing the system to achieve high productivity through automated end-to-end processing while managing complexity through functional decomposition and specialized processing at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11603101B2Systems and methods for vehicles resolving a standoff
Publication Date: 2023.03.14 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11603101B2 patent drawing
  • US11603101B2 patent drawing
  • US11603101B2 patent drawing

AI summary

System, methods, and other embodiments described herein relate to resolving a standoff by a vehicle. In one embodiment, a method includes generating a happens-before relationship that explains events between the vehicle and other vehicles before the standoff. The standoff may be a dispute for a right of way between the vehicle and the other vehicles. The method also includes identifying the standoff using a causality relationship analysis according to the happens-before relationship. The method also includes generating a mitigation plan for the standoff that forms standoff solutions in association with the standoff being similar to a prior standoff. The method also includes resolving the standoff by causing vehicle maneuvers associated with the vehicle according to the standoff solutions.