Vehicle Stop Interaction Monitoring With Remote Advisor Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicle operators experience stress during pullover events, and there is a need for a system to monitor and manage interactions between operators and security personnel, ensuring safety and clarity in communication.

Innovation Solution

An interaction monitoring system comprising a video camera, microphone, audio speaker, telematics system, and controller that captures and evaluates interactions, engages a third-party advisor when necessary, and communicates with a remote facility to provide support during and after the event.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a vehicle operator is compelled to pull over and stop in response to a command by an authority figure or security personnel, then the security objective is achieved, but the vehicle operator experiences stress and uncertainty about the basis for the stopping event

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity objective achievementVSAvoidoperator stress
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides real-time feedback to the vehicle operator during a compelled stopping event by establishing a communication link with a remote facility. The feedback includes information about the interaction being monitored and recorded, and optionally, communication with a third-party advisor, which reduces operator stress by providing transparency and support while maintaining security objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system acts as an intermediary between the vehicle operator and the security personnel. It records the interaction, provides feedback to the operator about what is being captured, and can connect with a third-party advisor who serves as a neutral mediator to reduce tension and provide objective oversight during the stopping event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If the vehicle operator questions the underlying basis or reason for the pullover event, then the operator seeks clarity, but the interaction becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclarity about stopping basisVSAvoidinteraction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically detecting the compelled stopping event and immediately initiating recording and feedback mechanisms. This preliminary action establishes a clear record of the interaction from the outset, providing the operator with clarity about the basis for the stop being documented, without requiring the operator to initiate the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides continuous feedback to the vehicle operator during the interaction, informing them that the interaction is being monitored and recorded. This feedback reduces information loss by making the operator aware of what is being captured and why, simplifying the interaction by eliminating uncertainty about the monitoring purpose.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If a monitoring system captures and evaluates interactions during a vehicle stopping event, then operator safety and interaction clarity are improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system performs multiple functions using a single integrated approach: it detects the compelled stopping event, records the interaction via audio and/or video, evaluates the interaction quality, provides feedback to the operator, and optionally connects with a third-party advisor. This multi-functionality improves operator safety without proportionally increasing system complexity by combining capabilities into a unified system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides self-service by automatically detecting the compelled stopping event and initiating the monitoring and evaluation process without requiring manual activation by the vehicle operator. This automation reduces the operational burden on the operator while maintaining comprehensive safety monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If the interaction between the vehicle operator and security personnel is monitored and evaluated in real-time, then the quality of interaction is improved, but the time required to process and respond to the event increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteraction evaluation qualityVSAvoidevent processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic action by evaluating the recorded interaction at specific intervals or at key points during the interaction, rather than requiring continuous real-time analysis. This approach maintains measurement precision by capturing essential interaction quality metrics while reducing the overall processing time by not analyzing every moment continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20240362955A1System and method for monitoring a vehicle stopping event
Publication Date: 2024.10.31 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US20240362955A1 patent drawing
  • US20240362955A1 patent drawing
  • US20240362955A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An interaction monitoring system for a subject vehicle includes: a spatial monitoring system including a video camera, a microphone, and an audio speaker; a telematics system; a vehicle monitoring system; and a controller. The controller includes an instruction set that is executable to periodically determine, via the vehicle monitoring system, operating parameters for the subject vehicle, and detect occurrence of a vehicle stopping event being commanded by a security person. The operating parameters are captured for a predetermined period of time immediately preceding the vehicle stopping event. During the stopping event, the video camera and the microphone monitor an interaction between a vehicle operator and the security person. The interaction between the vehicle operator and the security person is evaluated, and a third-party advisor is engaged based upon the interaction between the vehicle operator and the security person.