Automated Vehicle Stop-Space Selection for Pick-Up and Drop-Off

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated driving systems lack an effective method to determine an appropriate stop space in predetermined pick-up and drop-off areas, which affects user convenience and time efficiency.

Innovation Solution

An automated driving system that includes a processor to control the vehicle's stop position based on surrounding situation information, prioritizing upstream areas for drop-off and downstream areas for pick-up to ensure efficient user access and vehicle departure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the automated driving vehicle stops in the standard stop space, then the stop position is fixed and predictable, but the stop space may not be available when other vehicles are present

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavailability of stop spaceVSAvoidflexibility in stop position selection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the stop position based on real-time availability. When the standard stop space is unavailable, the processor automatically selects alternative stop spaces in the upstream or downstream areas, making the stop position flexible rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the stop position parameter based on the availability of the standard stop space. The processor determines whether the standard stop space is available and switches between the standard position and alternative positions (upstream or downstream) accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If the automated driving vehicle stops in the upstream area for drop-off, then the user can quickly get off the vehicle, but the vehicle cannot utilize the standard stop space efficiently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser disembarkation timeVSAvoidvehicle turnover efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different stop position strategies based on the local situation. When the standard stop space is unavailable, it selectively uses upstream areas for drop-off operations to minimize user disembarkation time, while preserving downstream areas for pick-up operations to maintain vehicle turnover efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The processor determines in advance whether the standard stop space is available before the vehicle arrives. If unavailable, it pre-determines the alternative stop position (upstream or downstream) based on whether the operation is drop-off or pick-up, allowing the vehicle to stop immediately without delay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of time

If the automated driving vehicle stops in the downstream area for pick-up, then the vehicle can depart quickly after user boards, but the user has to wait longer for the vehicle to arrive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle departure timeVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different stop position strategies based on the local situation. When the standard stop space is unavailable, it selectively uses downstream areas for pick-up operations to minimize vehicle departure time and waiting time, while preserving upstream areas for drop-off operations to maintain user convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The processor determines in advance whether the standard stop space is available before the vehicle arrives. If unavailable, it pre-determines the alternative stop position (upstream or downstream) based on whether the operation is drop-off or pick-up, allowing the vehicle to stop immediately without delay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If the automated driving system uses a fixed stop position, then the control is simple, but the system cannot adapt to unavailable stop spaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestop position control complexityVSAvoidadaptability to stop space availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the stop position based on real-time availability. When the standard stop space is unavailable, the processor automatically selects alternative stop spaces in the upstream or downstream areas, making the stop position flexible rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the stop position parameter based on the availability of the standard stop space. The processor determines whether the standard stop space is available and switches between the standard position and alternative positions (upstream or downstream) accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11858534B2Automated driving system
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11858534B2 patent drawing
  • US11858534B2 patent drawing
  • US11858534B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pick-up and drop-off area, which is a predetermined area in which an automated driving vehicle stops to pick up or drop off a user, includes a downstream area existing downstream of a standard stop space and an upstream area existing upstream of the standard stop space. An automated driving system controls the automated driving vehicle so as to stop in a target stop space in the pick-up and drop-off area. When the standard stop space is available, the standard stop space is set as the target stop space. When the standard stop space is not available for the automated driving vehicle to stop to drop off the user, the automated driving system searches for an upstream available space in the upstream area and preferentially sets the upstream available space as the target stop space.