Automated Vehicle Subsystem Diagnostics for Anomaly Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated vehicles lack the ability to detect and remediate system malfunctions and failures independently, as they rely on human drivers for these functions, which is not feasible in fully autonomous systems.

Innovation Solution

A diagnostic system and method that monitors vehicle subsystems, generates a master diagnostic message for anomalous conditions, and adjusts operations or communicates with other subsystems to ensure safe operation, utilizing existing sensors and data to detect anomalies and failures in steering, braking, and powertrain systems, and transmits alerts to remote devices for further assistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If automated vehicles replace human drivers, then automation level increases, but the ability to detect and remediate system malfunctions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidsystem malfunction detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The diagnostic system enables the automated vehicle to self-diagnose and self-monitor its own subsystems through continuous data collection from sensors, establishing normal operating zones and detecting anomalies without human intervention. The system records operating parameters, compares them against established norms, and autonomously identifies deviations indicating malfunctions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors subsystem data, compares current operating zones against normal ranges, and provides feedback when anomalies are detected. The diagnostic message transmits anomaly information back to the vehicle control system, enabling real-time adjustments or alerts to maintain safe operation despite the lack of human drivers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Extent of automation

If human drivers are unavailable to detect malfunctions, then automation increases, but safety response to failures deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver replacement levelVSAvoidsafety response to failures
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes normal operating zones for each subsystem based on design parameters and operational data before malfunctions occur. By having these reference ranges predetermined, the system can immediately detect and respond to deviations without requiring human analysis or judgment, ensuring rapid safety responses even when drivers are unavailable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The diagnostic system acts as an intermediary between vehicle subsystems and the central control, translating raw sensor data into meaningful anomaly detections and diagnostic messages. This intermediary layer processes information from multiple sensors and subsystems, identifying patterns that indicate safety issues before they become critical failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If diagnostic systems monitor multiple subsystems continuously, then detection capability improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection precisionVSAvoiddiagnostic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The diagnostic system divides the vehicle into discrete subsystems (powertrain, braking, steering, etc.), each with its own normal operating zone parameters monitored independently. This segmentation allows the system to manage complexity by treating each subsystem separately while maintaining comprehensive monitoring, as each subsystem can be analyzed and diagnosed without requiring simultaneous processing of all vehicle systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11787428B2Diagnostic method and system for an automated vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 ZF FRIEDRICHSHAFEN AG
  • US11787428B2 patent drawing
  • US11787428B2 patent drawing
  • US11787428B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A diagnostic method for an automated vehicle includes monitoring data from a first vehicle subsystem of a plurality of vehicle subsystems to establish a current operating zone for the first vehicle subsystem, transmitting a master diagnostic message with an anomalous status for the first vehicle subsystem in response to the current operating zone for the first vehicle subsystem being outside of an anomalous behavior boundary of a normal operating zone for the first vehicle subsystem for at least a predetermined period of time, the common master diagnostic message being transmitted to each vehicle subsystem of the plurality of vehicle subsystems, and adjusting operation of at least a second one of the plurality of vehicle subsystems in response to receiving the master diagnostic message with the anomalous status for the first vehicle subsystem. A related diagnostic system is also provided.