Autonomous Vehicle Subsystem Supervision for Fault Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for evaluating the performance of autonomous vehicles do not effectively pinpoint the sub-systems responsible for malfunctions, especially in critical situations.

Innovation Solution

A method and device for supervising the operation of a motor vehicle equipped with multiple automated systems, which involves activating supervision, iteratively measuring and scoring the performance of each automated system, and updating the systems based on their scores.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If overall behavior evaluation is used to assess autonomous vehicle performance, then the evaluation covers all systems comprehensively, but the ability to pinpoint specific malfunctioning sub-systems is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation comprehensivenessVSAvoidmalfunction source identification
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the autonomous vehicle into multiple independent automated systems (perception system, decision-making system, control system) and evaluates each separately through iterative supervision. This segmentation allows precise identification of which specific subsystem caused a malfunction while maintaining comprehensive coverage of all systems through the ordered evaluation sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If iterative supervision of each automated system is implemented, then the malfunctioning sub-system can be identified precisely, but the complexity of the supervision process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalfunction source identificationVSAvoidsupervision process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes a predetermined ordered set of automated systems to be evaluated in sequence (perception → decision-making → control). This preliminary arrangement of evaluation order simplifies the supervision process by providing a clear, structured workflow that reduces complexity while maintaining precise malfunction identification through systematic iteration through each subsystem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Extent of automation

If reinforcement learning algorithm is used for overall behavior evaluation, then the evaluation can be automated, but the specific sub-systems causing malfunctions cannot be pinpointed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation automationVSAvoidsub-system identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary evaluation mechanism that sits between the automated reinforcement learning evaluation and the specific subsystem identification. The iterative supervision process acts as an intermediary that translates the overall automated evaluation into specific subsystem-level diagnostics, allowing both automation and precise identification to coexist.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250065893A1Method for supervising the operation of a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.02.27 AMPERE SAS
  • US20250065893A1 patent drawing
  • US20250065893A1 patent drawing
  • US20250065893A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method supervises the operation of a motor vehicle included an ordered set of at least two automated systems. The method includes activating the supervision of the ordered set of automated systems and iterations of supervising an automated system. Each iteration is applied successively, according to the order of the ordered set, to one of the automated systems. The supervising including measuring a performance of the automated system being supervised, and optionally assigning a positive, negative, or zero score to the automated system being supervised on the basis of the measured performance. The method also includes updating at least one automated system of the ordered set on the basis of the score assigned to the at least one automated system