Vehicle Surface Deformation Identification via Optical Pattern Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern vehicles require advanced Human-Machine Interfaces (HMIs) that can differentiate between various types of user inputs, such as compressive and rotational inputs, to effectively operate vehicle components, while minimizing the number of visible and static physical buttons, enhancing user experience and customization.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses a projector to project icons onto a surface with an embedded invisible ink pattern, which deforms upon user input, and a camera to detect these changes, allowing the vehicle computer to identify and actuate components based on the specific input type, utilizing strain gauges and depth sensing to reduce false positives and improve input recognition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a touchscreen display is used to control vehicle components, then the number of physical buttons is reduced, but the ability to differentiate between various types of user inputs (compressive, rotational, etc.) is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of physical buttonsVSAvoidinput differentiation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical buttons with a touchscreen display that uses optical detection to identify user inputs. The system captures images of the touchscreen surface and analyzes deformation patterns to distinguish between different input types (compressive, rotational, etc.), thereby eliminating the need for multiple physical buttons while maintaining versatile input recognition capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If a touchscreen display is used to minimize physical buttons, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision of user input types is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of physical buttonsVSAvoiduser input detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces mechanical buttons with an optical detection system that captures images of the touchscreen surface. By analyzing deformation patterns, strain gauge readings, and depth sensing data, the system achieves precise measurement of user input types (compressive, rotational, etc.) without requiring physical buttons, thus maintaining measurement precision while reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary detection system consisting of a camera, strain gauges, and depth sensing technology. This intermediary layer captures and analyzes surface deformations caused by user inputs, enabling precise measurement of input types without direct mechanical contact, thereby resolving the contradiction between reduced device complexity and maintained measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If strain gauges and depth sensing are added to improve input recognition, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput recognition accuracyVSAvoidnumber of sensors
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple detection technologies (camera-based image capture, strain gauge measurement, and depth sensing) into a unified input recognition system. By integrating these sensors to work together and analyzing their combined data through image processing and pattern recognition algorithms, the system achieves high measurement precision for user input types while managing device complexity through coordinated sensor operation rather than separate independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables a customizable and intuitive interface that accurately interprets user intent, reducing the need for numerous physical buttons and enhancing the vehicle's ability to operate components in response to diverse user inputs, improving user experience and interface efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

A camera detects the deformation to the pattern

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical imaging: Photography

Implementation Method 2

A camera detects the deformation to the pattern, and the computer can identify the user input based on the detected deformation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStrain measurement: Piezoresistive Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11157114B1Vehicle surface deformation identification
Publication Date: 2021.10.26 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US11157114B1 patent drawing
  • US11157114B1 patent drawing
  • US11157114B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer includes a processor and a memory, the memory storing instructions executable by the processor to project an icon onto a surface having a pattern, capture an image of the icon and the pattern, identify a change between the pattern in the image and a default pattern, identify a user input based on the change from the default pattern, and actuate a component based on the user input.