Multi-Vehicle Task Allocation for Resilient Team Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vehicle coordination systems are vulnerable to central controller failure and are ineffective in scenarios where the controller is remote from other team members, leading to loss of coordination and inability to achieve common goals.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for vehicle coordination where a command vehicle allocates tasks to other vehicles based on their capabilities, allowing for decentralized task execution and adaptability in case of central controller failure or remote operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a single entity has centralized control over the entire team, then coordination and decision-making efficiency are improved, but the system becomes vulnerable to central controller failure and is ineffective when the controller is remote from other team members

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordination efficiencyVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized control function into distributed control nodes across multiple vehicles. Each vehicle is equipped with processing capabilities to independently execute tasks and make decisions, transforming the monolithic centralized controller into segmented autonomous units that can operate independently or in coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of centralization based on operational needs and controller availability. When a centralized controller is present and nearby, it coordinates tasks efficiently; when remote or incapacitated, control dynamically shifts to distributed vehicles, allowing the system to adapt its control architecture to maintain reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If a centralized controller is used, then task allocation can be centralized and simplified, but the system cannot adequately direct team members when the controller is remote

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidremote direction capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Each vehicle is equipped with autonomous capabilities including onboard processors, capability profiles, and task execution systems. Vehicles can independently assess their own capabilities, receive and execute task allocations, and make local decisions without requiring constant remote direction, enabling them to serve themselves when the centralized controller is remote.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local intelligence and decision-making capabilities at each vehicle rather than requiring all control functions to be centralized. Each vehicle has tailored processing power and autonomy appropriate to its specific capabilities and mission role, allowing effective local operation regardless of centralized controller proximity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If task allocation is based on vehicle capabilities, then goal achievement is optimized, but the system requires complex capability tracking and validation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegoal achievement efficiencyVSAvoidcapability management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes capability profiles for each vehicle before task allocation occurs. These profiles contain information about sensor suites, actuators, computational resources, and mission-specific capabilities. By having capabilities predetermined and documented, the system simplifies the task allocation process rather than requiring complex real-time capability assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where vehicles report their capability status, task completion status, and resource availability to the centralized controller. This continuous feedback loop enables dynamic task reallocation and optimization based on actual vehicle states, improving goal achievement while managing complexity through automated information exchange.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11037451B2System and method for coordination among a plurality of vehicles
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 BAE SYSTEMS PLC
  • US11037451B2 patent drawing
  • US11037451B2 patent drawing
  • US11037451B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for coordinating a plurality of vehicles (102, 104) comprising: defining, as a command vehicle (C), a vehicle in the plurality; storing, by one or more storage devices (204) located on one or more of the vehicles (102, 104), a list of capabilities of each vehicle (102, 104); receiving, by one or more processors (202) on the command vehicle (C), a specification of a goal; based on the stored vehicle capabilities, allocating, by the one or more processors (202), to one or more of the vehicles (102, 104), one or more tasks, the one or more tasks being such that, if each of those tasks was to be performed, the goal would be accomplished; and sending, from the command vehicle (C), to each vehicle (102, 104) to which a task has been allocated, a specification of the one or more tasks allocated to that vehicle (102, 104).