Multi-Vehicle Task Reassignment for High-Priority Schedule Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need to improve the certainty of task execution in a system involving multiple vehicles, as existing technologies do not effectively handle task delays or reassignment to ensure high-priority tasks are completed reliably.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that communicates with multiple vehicles, transmitting instructions to a vehicle with a lower-priority task to execute a higher-priority task if the original vehicle cannot complete it on time, using a controller to manage task schedules and vehicle availability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a substitute vehicle is assigned to execute a high-priority task, then task execution certainty is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution certaintyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically manages substitute vehicle identification and task reassignment without requiring manual intervention. The management server autonomously evaluates vehicle availability, compares schedules, and executes reassignment decisions, reducing operational complexity despite the added functional complexity of the substitute vehicle mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where the management server continuously monitors vehicle status, receives failure notifications, and triggers substitute vehicle activation only when necessary. This feedback-based approach activates the complex substitute vehicle mechanism only when needed, effectively managing system complexity while maintaining execution certainty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If multiple vehicles are managed with task schedules, then productivity is improved, but coordination complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution efficiencyVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The management server provides universal coordination functions that handle multiple vehicles, task types, and failure scenarios through a single centralized system. This multi-functional approach consolidates coordination complexity into one platform rather than requiring separate coordination mechanisms for each vehicle or task type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250217741A1Information processing apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US20250217741A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217741A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217741A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes a communication interface, and a controller configured to communicate, using the communication interface, with a plurality of vehicles each of which has a schedule for executing a task, and transmit, upon receiving information indicating that a first task in a first time period cannot be executed as scheduled from a first vehicle, instruction information to cause at least one second vehicle that has a schedule for executing a second task with a lower priority than the first task for the first time period to execute the first task instead of the second task in place of the first vehicle.