Vehicle Torque Change Monitoring for Engine Abnormality Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control devices struggle to accurately determine drive source abnormalities due to variations in sensor performance and drive source configurations, leading to delayed or incomplete danger avoidance capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A control device that calculates requested and estimated torque changes over time, using integrated differences to detect abnormalities and output appropriate determinations, thereby enabling timely and effective danger avoidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a threshold value with a large margin is set for comparing estimated generation torque, then the control device becomes more reliable in avoiding false positives, but the abnormality determination becomes delayed or incomplete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabnormality determination accuracyVSAvoidabnormality detection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the abnormality determination process into two independent evaluation dimensions: (1) comparison of estimated generation torque with requested torque, and (2) comparison of torque change rates. This segmentation allows each dimension to use appropriate thresholds without compromising overall detection speed and accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension of evaluation by comparing torque change rates (dTorque/dt) in addition to absolute torque values. This dimensional expansion enables the system to detect abnormalities based on the rate of change, providing an additional detection pathway that reduces reliance on single threshold margins

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of time

If the threshold value is set with a small margin to enable faster abnormality determination, then the abnormality detection time is reduced, but the control device may produce false positives in normal states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabnormality detection timeVSAvoidabnormality determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the determination logic into separate evaluation paths: one for absolute torque comparison and another for torque change rate comparison. This allows each path to use optimized thresholds appropriate to its detection purpose, reducing false positives while maintaining detection speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The torque change rate comparison acts as an intermediary evaluation mechanism that filters out false positives from absolute torque comparisons. By requiring both conditions to be met or providing alternative detection pathways, the system reduces erroneous abnormality determinations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If sensor performance variations and drive source configuration differences are not accounted for, then the device complexity is reduced, but the measurement precision of torque estimation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidestimated generation torque accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter being monitored from absolute torque values to torque change rates (derivatives). This parameter transformation makes the measurement less sensitive to sensor performance variations and drive source configuration differences, improving precision without requiring complex calibration systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary calculation of torque change rates before abnormality determination. This preliminary processing of the data prepares it for comparison in a form that is inherently more robust to variations in sensor and drive source characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11945446B2Control device
Publication Date: 2024.04.02 ASTEMO LTD
  • US11945446B2 patent drawing
  • US11945446B2 patent drawing
  • US11945446B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An in-vehicle control device includes: a requested torque calculation unit which calculates a requested torque on the basis of a driving state of a vehicle; a requested torque change amount calculation unit which calculates the amount of change in requested torque per unit time as a requested torque change amount; an estimated generation torque calculation unit which calculates estimated generation torque estimated as being generated by an engine; an estimated generation torque change amount calculation unit which calculates the amount of change in estimated generation torque per unit time as an estimated generation torque change amount; and an abnormality detection unit which detects an abnormality of the engine on the basis of the integrated value of a difference between the requested torque change amount and the estimated generation torque change amount, and outputs abnormality determination for the engine.