Vehicle Tracking Point Placement for Speed-Adaptive Path Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems using tracking points for position representation suffer from issues such as slow convergence to desired paths, oscillation behavior, and poor path adherence, particularly at varying vehicle speeds.

Innovation Solution

Dynamically adapting the location of the tracking point based on vehicle speed, using methods like linear interpolation and reference speed-location mapping, to optimize vehicle control for both high and low speeds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a fixed tracking point location is used for vehicle control, then the system complexity is reduced, but the vehicle control performance deteriorates with slow convergence to desired path and oscillation behavior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking point selection systemVSAvoidvehicle control stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The tracking point location is made dynamic by adapting it based on vehicle speed. The system transitions from a fixed tracking point to a speed-adaptive tracking point that moves along the longitudinal axis of the vehicle, resolving the contradiction between system simplicity and control stability across varying operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of tracking point location based on vehicle speed. By adjusting the longitudinal position of the tracking point according to speed variations, the system maintains reliable vehicle control without requiring complex multi-point systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If a single tracking point location is used for all speeds, then the ease of operation is improved, but the manufacturing precision of path following deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking point configurationVSAvoidpath following accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The tracking point location dynamically adapts to vehicle speed, allowing the system to maintain high path following accuracy across different speeds without requiring manual reconfiguration. The tracking point automatically shifts position based on speed feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses vehicle speed as feedback to adjust the tracking point location. This closed-loop approach ensures that the tracking point remains optimally positioned for accurate path following regardless of speed variations, while maintaining ease of operation through automatic adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Stability of the object's composition

If the tracking point location is fixed at the rear axle, then the stability at high speeds is improved, but the path adherence at low speeds deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle motion stabilityVSAvoidpath tracking accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The tracking point location transitions from a fixed rear axle position to a dynamic position that varies with speed. At high speeds, the tracking point remains near the rear axle for stability, while at low speeds, it shifts forward to improve path tracking accuracy, resolving the speed-dependent performance contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the tracking point's longitudinal position parameter based on vehicle speed. This parameter adaptation allows the system to optimize both stability and path tracking accuracy for different operating conditions without requiring separate control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If the tracking point location is fixed at the front axle, then the path adherence at low speeds is improved, but the stability at high speeds deteriorates with oscillation behavior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath tracking accuracyVSAvoidvehicle motion stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The tracking point dynamically adjusts its position based on speed, shifting forward at low speeds to improve path tracking accuracy and moving rearward at high speeds to maintain stability. This dynamic repositioning eliminates the need to choose between the two conflicting fixed positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system adapts the tracking point's longitudinal position parameter according to vehicle speed, allowing optimization of both path tracking accuracy and motion stability for different speed ranges within a single unified system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12534079B2Location of vehicle tracking point
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 VOLVO TRUCK CORP
  • US12534079B2 patent drawing
  • US12534079B2 patent drawing
  • US12534079B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of selecting a location of a tracking point for a vehicle unit of a vehicle includes dynamically adapting the location of the tracking point based on a vehicle speed. In some examples, the location of the tracking point for a relatively high speed is located (along the vehicle unit) in front of the location of the tracking point for a relatively low speed. Also disclosed is a method of determining a reference location of the tracking point for a reference speed. The method comprises evaluating vehicle motion behavior for a plurality of candidate locations of the tracking point, and selecting one of the candidate locations as the reference location based on vehicle motion behavior metric values acquired through the evaluation.