Autonomous Vehicle Traffic Behavior Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in matching their driving behavior with that of a predominating population of reference vehicles, leading to unpredictability and potential aggressive driving behaviors from other users, and in addressing atypical traffic behaviors of surrounding objects, which can result in missed opportunities and safety issues.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of traffic behavior models that describe predominating and atypical driving behaviors of reference vehicles and objects, allowing the vehicle to adjust its operation to match the predominant behavior and provide user assistance through autonomous or manual control, including predictive alerts and corrective actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If autonomous vehicles operate independently without matching predominating driving behavior, then autonomous operation capability is maintained, but unpredictability and aggressive driving responses from other users increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAdaptability to traffic patternsVSAvoidPredictability of driving behavior
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous operation system dynamically adjusts its driving behavior by selecting from multiple behavioral modes (aggressive, moderate, conservative) based on real-time analysis of predominating traffic patterns. This allows the system to adapt its characteristics to match surrounding vehicles while maintaining autonomous control capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key driving behavior parameters such as time headway, following distance, and acceleration profiles to match the predominating traffic behavior. By adjusting these parameters, the autonomous vehicle becomes more predictable to other users while retaining its autonomous operation functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the vehicle uses complex traffic behavior models to predict and match driving behaviors, then predictability and safety improve, but system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSafety and predictabilityVSAvoidComplexity of traffic behavior modeling system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of developing complex predictive models from scratch, the system copies and replicates the driving behavior patterns of predominating traffic. By observing and mimicking the behavior of surrounding vehicles, the system achieves predictability without requiring overly complex computational models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the driving behaviors of surrounding vehicles and uses this feedback to adjust its own behavior. This closed-loop approach allows the system to learn and adapt to traffic patterns in real-time, improving safety and predictability while keeping the computational complexity manageable through iterative adjustment rather than complex upfront modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the vehicle continuously monitors and adjusts to match predominating driving behavior, then traffic flow efficiency improves, but energy consumption and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveTraffic flow efficiencyVSAvoidEnergy consumption for behavior matching
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs behavior matching adjustments at periodic intervals rather than continuously. By evaluating predominating traffic patterns at set intervals and making discrete adjustments, the system maintains traffic flow efficiency while reducing the computational load and energy consumption associated with constant monitoring and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11314253B2Providing user assistance in a vehicle based on traffic behavior models
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11314253B2 patent drawing
  • US11314253B2 patent drawing
  • US11314253B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Autonomous driving includes identifying a traffic behavior of an object in an environment surrounding a vehicle based on an evaluation of information about the environment surrounding the vehicle while the vehicle is in the midst of manual operation, and operating vehicle systems in the vehicle to perform a driving maneuver according to a driving plan for performing the driving maneuver. The autonomous driving further includes receiving a traffic behavior model that describes a predominating traffic behavior of a like population of reference objects, and operating the vehicle systems to perform the driving maneuver according to the driving plan in response to identifying that the traffic behavior of the object does not match the predominating traffic behavior of the like population of reference objects. Under the driving plan, the traffic behavior of the object is addressed.