Autonomous Vehicle Traffic Behavior Model Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in providing effective user assistance by matching driving behavior with that of a predominating population of reference vehicles, leading to unpredictability and potential safety issues due to deviations from typical driving behaviors.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of traffic behavior models that describe predominating and atypical driving behaviors, allowing vehicles to provide prospective and remedial instructions to users to align their driving with the models, and to initiate corrective or defensive operations when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If autonomous operation systems generate driving plans based on detected environmental information, then the vehicle can operate autonomously, but the driving behavior may deviate from typical human driving patterns leading to unpredictability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous operation capabilityVSAvoidpredictability of driving behavior
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the vehicle's driving behavior and compares it against the traffic behavior model representing typical human driving patterns. When deviations are detected, the system provides feedback to the planning module to adjust future driving decisions, ensuring alignment with expected human behavior while maintaining autonomous operation capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts driving plan parameters by incorporating a traffic behavior model that captures statistical characteristics of typical human driving patterns. This allows the autonomous vehicle to modify its decision-making parameters (such as acceleration rates, lane change timing, and response to traffic signals) to match predominant human driving behavior, thereby improving predictability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the autonomous operation system provides user assistance to align driving behavior with typical patterns, then safety is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety through behavior alignmentVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The planning module serves multiple functions: it generates autonomous driving plans, evaluates them against the traffic behavior model, and provides user assistance when deviations occur. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components for each function, thereby managing system complexity while achieving behavior alignment and safety improvements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If the system issues prospective and remedial instructions to users, then driving behavior alignment is improved, but the interaction complexity with users increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving behavior alignment precisionVSAvoiduser interaction simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system issues prospective instructions to users in advance of potential driving behavior deviations, allowing users to proactively adjust their driving to align with typical patterns before problems occur. This preliminary intervention reduces the need for complex remedial instructions and simplifies user interaction by preventing issues before they arise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11315418B2Providing user assistance in a vehicle based on traffic behavior models
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11315418B2 patent drawing
  • US11315418B2 patent drawing
  • US11315418B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Providing user assistance in a vehicle includes identifying a driving behavior of the vehicle based on an evaluation of information about manual operation of the vehicle and information about an environment surrounding the vehicle, and issuing an alert to a user prompting the user to implement corrective manual operation. The user assistance further includes receiving a traffic behavior model that describes a predominating driving behavior of a like population of reference vehicles, and issuing the alert to a user prompting the user to implement corrective manual operation in response to identifying that the driving behavior of the vehicle does not match the predominating driving behavior of the like population of reference vehicles. Under the corrective manual operation, the driving behavior of the vehicle matches the predominating driving behavior of the like population of reference vehicles.