Automated Vehicle Trajectory Control in Dynamic Environments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Controlling automated vehicles to accurately follow dynamic reference trajectories is challenging due to issues like conflicting terms, model mismatch, computational delays, and control delays, which can lead to excessive divergence from the normal state trajectory, impeding effective operation in dynamically changing environments.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that receives image data and LiDAR data to process a planned trajectory for an automated vehicle. This involves executing a predictive optimal control problem to determine control signals that enable the vehicle to follow the planned trajectory accurately within dynamic environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional control methods are used to follow dynamic reference trajectories, then the control system is simpler, but the vehicle experiences excessive divergence from the normal state trajectory due to conflicting terms, model mismatch, computational delays, and control delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory following accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts control inputs based on real-time vehicle state and trajectory deviations. The method continuously solves optimal control problems using current sensor data and updated vehicle models, allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions and maintain accurate trajectory following without requiring excessive computational complexity in the control architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs predictive optimal control by solving the optimal control problem in advance for a prediction horizon. The method calculates future control inputs based on predicted vehicle states and trajectory requirements, allowing the system to proactively compensate for model mismatch and computational delays before they cause significant trajectory divergence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If predictive optimal control is executed to determine control signals, then trajectory following accuracy is improved, but computational delays increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory following accuracyVSAvoidcomputational delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The optimal control problem is solved periodically at discrete time steps with a defined sampling rate. The system executes the predictive control algorithm at regular intervals, updating control signals based on the latest sensor measurements and vehicle state, which balances computational load with the need for accurate real-time control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The prediction horizon is divided into discrete time steps or segments. The optimal control problem is solved for each segment independently, allowing the computational task to be broken down into manageable portions that can be processed efficiently without requiring excessive computational resources at any single moment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If the vehicle operates in dynamically changing environments with obstacles, then adaptability is improved, but trajectory divergence increases due to conflicting control terms and model mismatch

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental adaptabilityVSAvoidtrajectory following accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors vehicle state through sensors (cameras, LiDAR, inertial measurement units) and compares actual position with desired trajectory. This feedback loop allows the system to detect deviations caused by dynamic environmental changes and adjust control inputs accordingly, compensating for model mismatch and maintaining trajectory accuracy in changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system adapts control parameters and vehicle model parameters based on observed environmental conditions and vehicle behavior. By dynamically adjusting parameters such as control gains, prediction horizon, and model characteristics, the system maintains accurate trajectory following across diverse and changing operational environments without requiring a completely different control approach for each scenario

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12291233B2System and method for providing accurate trajectory following for automated vehicles in dynamic environments
Publication Date: 2025.05.06 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12291233B2 patent drawing
  • US12291233B2 patent drawing
  • US12291233B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for providing accurate trajectory following for automated vehicles in dynamic environments that include receiving image data and LiDAR data associated with a dynamic environment of a vehicle. The system and method also include processing a planned trajectory of the vehicle that is based on an analysis of the image data and LiDAR data. The system and method further include communicating control signals associated with following the planned trajectory to autonomously control the vehicle to follow the planned trajectory to navigate within the dynamic environment to reach a goal.