Vehicle Cybersecurity Trigger Device and Electrical Gate

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cybersecurity measures for connected vehicles are not reliable enough to prevent cyber-attacks, as they can be bypassed by sophisticated techniques, leaving drivers and passengers vulnerable to vehicle control by external attackers.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that allows a driver to activate a trigger device connected to an electrical gate, which disables vehicle connectivity to the outside world and switches to a backup network, using hardware mechanisms to regain control, even if software-based defenses fail.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If software-based cybersecurity mechanisms are used to protect connected vehicles, then vehicle security is improved, but reliability against sophisticated cyber-attacks deteriorates because these mechanisms can be bypassed or compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecybersecurity reliabilityVSAvoidvulnerability to cyber-attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the cybersecurity protection into two independent segments: software-based mechanisms and hardware-based mechanisms. The trigger device and electrical gate form a separate hardware segment that operates independently from the vehicle's software systems, preventing attackers who compromise software from disabling the security response capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The electrical gate acts as an intermediary component between the trigger device and the vehicle's connectivity interfaces. When the driver activates the trigger device, the electrical gate physically disconnects the connectivity interfaces (TCU, antennas) from the vehicle network, creating a hardware-mediated barrier that blocks cyber-attacks regardless of software compromise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If connectivity interfaces are disabled to stop cyber-attacks, then vehicle security is improved, but loss of communication and network functionality increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle securityVSAvoidcommunication loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides dynamic control over connectivity interfaces through the electrical gate. The gate can switch between two states: connected (normal operation with full communication functionality) and disconnected (security mode with communication blocked). This dynamic switching allows the system to adapt to security threats while maintaining normal operations when safe

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares counter-measures in advance by pre-installing the electrical gate and trigger device. When a cyber-attack is detected or suspected, the driver can immediately activate the trigger device to disconnect connectivity interfaces, preventing further attack propagation without needing to analyze or respond to the specific attack in real-time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Reliability

If a hardware-based response system is added to provide reliable cybersecurity, then reliability against cyber-attacks is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecybersecurity response reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the critical security response function from the complex vehicle software architecture and implements it as a simple hardware mechanism. The trigger device and electrical gate form a standalone hardware subsystem that performs the essential security function of disconnecting connectivity interfaces, independent of the vehicle's complex software layers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The trigger device is designed as a simple, inexpensive hardware component that can be easily replaced or reset. After a cyber-attack is neutralized by activating the electrical gate, the trigger device can be reset or replaced without requiring complex recovery procedures, allowing rapid response to security threats

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentEP4184862A1Cybersecurity response by a driver of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.05.24 VALEO COMFORT & DRIVING ASSISTANCE
  • EP4184862A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4184862A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4184862A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The disclosure notably relates to a method for cybersecurity response/cyber resiliency by a driver of a vehicle, the vehicle comprising a trigger device accessible to the driver and coupled by wire to an electrical gate of the vehicle. The method comprises, upon a cyberattack on the vehicle, activating the trigger device by the driver, thereby disabling by the electrical gate, vehicle connectivity to outside of the vehicle. The disclosure also relates to a vehicle system for performing said method. These provide new solutions to respond to cyber-attacks in vehicles with increased safety.