Vehicle Time-to-Collision Prediction Using Trajectory Intersections

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for determining time to collision (TTC) in intelligent driving systems are prone to inaccuracies due to single-step predictions, especially when large time intervals are involved, and are affected by perception errors, leading to poor robustness and high resource utilization.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines collision conditions and multiple trajectory intersections between an ego vehicle and a target object using vehicle and detection data to accurately calculate TTC, improving prediction accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If single-step prediction and deduction is used for TTC calculation, then the calculation process is simple, but the accuracy deteriorates when time interval is large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation process complexityVSAvoidTTC calculation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single-step prediction process into multiple sub-steps, where the prediction is performed in segments across different time intervals. This segmentation allows the system to maintain calculation simplicity while improving accuracy by breaking down the complex prediction into manageable parts that can be processed sequentially.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a temporal dimension by considering multiple time intervals and trajectory intersections rather than a single time step. This dimensional expansion transforms the problem from a single-point prediction to a multi-point analysis, improving accuracy without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If single-step prediction with small time interval is used, then the accuracy is improved, but resource utilization deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveTTC calculation accuracyVSAvoidresource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the prediction process to focus computational resources only on critical trajectory intersections and collision conditions rather than continuously calculating at every small time interval. This selective segmentation maintains accuracy at critical moments while reducing overall resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing detailed predictions only when trajectory intersections indicate potential collision risks, rather than continuously executing full prediction algorithms at every time step. This approach maintains necessary accuracy while avoiding excessive resource usage during low-risk periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If conventional single-step prediction is used, then the calculation is fast, but robustness against perception errors deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation speedVSAvoidrobustness against perception errors
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where multiple trajectory intersections and collision conditions are evaluated to verify prediction consistency. This feedback loop allows the system to quickly identify and correct perception errors by cross-validating results across multiple prediction paths, maintaining both speed and robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary analysis of trajectory intersections and collision conditions before final TTC determination. This preliminary action allows the system to quickly filter out obviously safe or unsafe scenarios, reserving detailed calculation only for borderline cases where perception errors might significantly impact the result, thus maintaining speed while improving robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250319868A1Method and apparatus for determining time to collision, device, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 SHANGHAI ANTING HORIZON INTELLIGENT TRANSP TECHNOLOGY CO LTD
  • US20250319868A1 patent drawing
  • US20250319868A1 patent drawing
  • US20250319868A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are a time to collision determining method and apparatus for a vehicle. The method includes: determining vehicle data of an ego vehicle and detection data of a target object; determining a first predicted driving trajectory of the ego vehicle and a second predicted driving trajectory of the target object based on the ego vehicle data and the detection data, respectively; determining a collision condition based on first driving data of the ego vehicle data, second driving data of the detection data, and the second predicted driving trajectory; determining a plurality of trajectory intersections based on the first predicted driving trajectory and the second predicted driving trajectory; and determining a time to collision based on the ego vehicle data, the detection data, the collision condition, and the plurality of trajectory intersections.