Vehicle Type Grouping for Software Vulnerability Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing analysis support systems for addressing software vulnerabilities in vehicles lack efficiency, as they require individual analysis for each vehicle type, leading to increased time and costs.

Innovation Solution

An analysis support system that classifies vehicle types into groups based on vehicle type information, such as configuration and OTA compatibility, to reduce overlapping examination contents and streamline vulnerability analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If individual analysis is performed for each vehicle type, then analysis accuracy is improved, but analysis time and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis accuracyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments vehicle types into distinct groups based on shared characteristics (e.g., platform, powertrain, body type). By dividing the analysis into group-level and vehicle-type-level stages, the system achieves comprehensive coverage without analyzing each vehicle type in isolation, thus reducing time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary grouping of vehicle types based on common characteristics before conducting detailed vulnerability analysis. This preliminary classification allows analysts to identify patterns and shared vulnerabilities across groups, reducing redundant analysis work while preserving the ability to perform detailed individual analysis when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If individual analysis is performed for each vehicle type, then analysis completeness is improved, but costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis completenessVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges analysis efforts by identifying and grouping vehicle types with similar characteristics. By combining analysis activities at the group level (e.g., analyzing common vulnerabilities across all vehicles sharing a platform), the system achieves comprehensive coverage without duplicating efforts for each individual vehicle type, thus reducing costs while maintaining completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates universal analysis frameworks and methodologies that can be applied across multiple vehicle types within a group. By developing group-level analysis templates and vulnerability assessments that are universally applicable to all vehicle types in a group, the system reduces the need for custom analysis for each vehicle type, thereby reducing costs while ensuring thorough coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If detailed vehicle type information is collected, then analysis precision is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis precisionVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and focuses on only the most relevant vehicle type characteristics needed for vulnerability analysis (e.g., platform, powertrain type, body style). By selectively extracting only the essential attributes rather than processing all available vehicle data, the system maintains high analysis precision while significantly reducing data processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different levels of data collection and analysis precision to different vehicle type groups based on their specific characteristics. Rather than uniformly collecting and processing detailed information for all vehicle types, the system tailors the depth of data collection to the specific analysis needs of each group, reducing overall processing complexity while maintaining necessary precision where required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250190586A1Analysis support system, analysis support method, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 PANASONIC AUTOMOTIVE SYST CO LTD
  • US20250190586A1 patent drawing
  • US20250190586A1 patent drawing
  • US20250190586A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An analysis support system supports analysis for addressing vulnerability of software provided to vehicles. The analysis support system includes: a data receiver that obtains vehicle type information on each of a plurality of vehicle types of the vehicles provided with the software having vulnerability; and a determiner that performs a first determination to classify the plurality of vehicle types into two or more groups for the analysis, based on the vehicle type information obtained for each of the plurality of vehicle types.