Vehicle Storage Compartment Unlock Delay for Adaptive Security Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle alarm systems lack a proactive and adaptive approach to security monitoring, particularly in determining the appropriate response to security events based on the ignition state and delay mode settings.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that determines the inactive state of a vehicle's ignition controls, activates a security monitoring application, and executes a tiered proactive measure in response to detected security events, considering the alarm status and delay mode state.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed delay alarm system is activated manually or continuously, then the vehicle security response time is extended, but the system lacks adaptability to different security situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity response adaptabilityVSAvoidsecurity response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The alarm system transitions from a static fixed delay configuration to a dynamic system that automatically adjusts the delay duration based on real-time detection of security events and their severity. The ECU monitors security events through sensors and modifies the alarm response timing dynamically, allowing shorter delays for high-severity events and longer delays for minor events, thus achieving both adaptability and timely response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the delay parameter based on the type and severity of detected security events. Different security events trigger different delay durations, transforming the single fixed delay parameter into a variable parameter that adapts to security conditions. This allows the system to optimize response time for each specific security scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the alarm system is triggered when the vehicle is locked, then security monitoring is activated, but the system lacks proactive measures before security events occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidproactive security automation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary security assessments by continuously monitoring vehicle conditions through sensors before actual security events occur. The ECU evaluates potential security risks in advance and prepares appropriate alarm responses, transitioning from reactive alarm triggering to proactive security monitoring and preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensors monitor vehicle conditions and provide data to the ECU, which then adjusts security monitoring levels and alarm readiness accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables the system to maintain reliable security monitoring while automatically adapting to changing conditions without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If traditional alarm systems use only audio and visual alerts, then the alarm function is simple, but the system lacks differentiated response strategies for different security event severities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm system complexityVSAvoidsecurity response differentiation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The alarm system segments security events into different severity levels (minor, moderate, major) and assigns differentiated response strategies to each level. This segmentation allows the system to maintain relative simplicity while providing tailored responses for different security scenarios, avoiding the need for a single complex response mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the alarm system are configured with different response characteristics based on the detected security event type. The ECU applies local quality by selecting specific alarm parameters, delay durations, and notification methods appropriate to each security event severity, enabling differentiated responses without requiring complete system redesign for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250145112A1Security monitoring system for a vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US20250145112A1 patent drawing
  • US20250145112A1 patent drawing
  • US20250145112A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle includes ignition controls operable between an active state and an inactive state and a storage compartment operable between a locked state and an unlocked state. An electronic control unit (ECU) is configured to detect one of the active state and the inactive state of the ignition controls and includes data processing hardware and memory hardware that stores a security monitoring system. The security monitoring system includes an alarm and a security monitoring application that is configured to execute a delay mode including a tiered proactive measure. The delay mode is configured to delay translation of the storage compartment from the locked state to the unlocked state in response to a security event.