Vehicle Program Update Scheduling During Planned Stop Windows

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing information processing systems for autonomous driving vehicles lack an efficient method to update programs at appropriate timings, potentially disrupting vehicle operations during updates.

Innovation Solution

An information processing device with a control unit that acquires program update information and formulates a plan to update the program while the vehicle is stopped, ensuring safety and minimizing operational disruptions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If program updates are performed during vehicle operation, then system functionality can be improved continuously, but vehicle safety and operational stability deteriorate due to potential disruptions during travel control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogram update capabilityVSAvoidvehicle operation safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control center formulates an update plan in advance that schedules program updates to occur only during predetermined stop time zones. This preliminary planning ensures that updates are performed proactively during maintenance periods rather than reactively during operation, preventing disruptions to travel control and maintaining vehicle safety while enabling continuous system improvement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The operation plan is segmented into distinct time zones: operation time zones for vehicle travel and stop time zones for maintenance activities. By dividing the operational timeline and assigning updates exclusively to stop time zones, the system separates update operations from travel control operations, eliminating the risk of interference while maintaining both update capability and operational safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If program updates are scheduled during vehicle stop periods, then operational safety is maintained, but update frequency and productivity decrease due to limited available time windows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle operation safetyVSAvoidupdate execution frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control center receives update completion notifications from the vehicle and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust future update plans. When updates are completed successfully during stop time zones, the system learns from this feedback and can optimize subsequent update scheduling, potentially increasing update frequency over time while maintaining the safety constraint of performing updates only during stop periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The update plan is not static but dynamically adjusted based on actual vehicle operation patterns and update completion status. The control center formulates updated plans that adapt to changing stop time zone availability, allowing the system to maximize update frequency within the constraints of safe operation by flexibly utilizing available maintenance windows

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12175230B2Information processing device, information processing method, and information processing system
Publication Date: 2024.12.24 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US12175230B2 patent drawing
  • US12175230B2 patent drawing
  • US12175230B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing device includes a control unit that executes acquiring information on update of a program implemented in a vehicle, and formulating a plan for updating the program while the vehicle is stopped in an operation plan based on the information on the update of the program.