Automated Vehicle Violation Detection System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for enforcing vehicle operation compliance, such as window and windshield conditions, tire types, and lighting, are inefficient and prone to errors due to varying jurisdiction standards and the need for manual police intervention, leading to unnecessary fines and missed violations.

Innovation Solution

An automated system using cameras and processors to analyze images of vehicles for potential violations, generating violation scores and notifications, with user input required for ambiguous cases and automatic notifications for clear violations, reducing human interaction and improving compliance enforcement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If police officers manually stop vehicles to enforce compliance, then violations can be detected and enforced, but safety risks increase and time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviolation detection reliabilityVSAvoidsafety risks from stopping vehicles
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of police officers physically stopping vehicles with an automated optical detection system using cameras and image processing algorithms. The system captures images of vehicles in motion, analyzes them using machine learning models to detect violations such as windshield cracks, tire conditions, and lighting issues, thereby eliminating the need for physical vehicle stops while maintaining reliable violation detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an automated image analysis system as an intermediary between the need for violation enforcement and the vehicles being inspected. This intermediary system processes vehicle images automatically, generating violation scores and notifications without requiring direct interaction between police officers and drivers, thus reducing safety risks while preserving enforcement capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If police officers manually inspect vehicles, then violations can be identified, but false positives and false negatives increase due to subjective judgment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviolation detection consistencyVSAvoidviolation detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces subjective human judgment with an automated machine learning-based image analysis system. The system uses trained models to objectively evaluate vehicle conditions, assigning violation scores based on detected features such as windshield integrity, tire condition, and lighting functionality. This substitution eliminates subjective interpretation while maintaining consistent and accurate violation detection across different officers and jurisdictions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the automated system generates violation scores that can be reviewed and adjusted by human operators. The system provides structured feedback on detected violations with confidence scores, allowing for verification and correction while maintaining overall objective and consistent detection standards. This feedback loop ensures both automation efficiency and accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated systems are used to detect violations, then safety risks are reduced and processing speed increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviolation processing speedVSAvoidautomated detection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the violation detection system into distinct functional modules: image capture subsystem, pre-processing module, violation detection algorithms, scoring system, and notification generator. Each module performs a specific function independently, allowing for easier development, testing, and maintenance. The segmentation enables the complex system to be built and managed in manageable components while achieving high processing speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs the automated detection system with universal components that can handle multiple types of violations using the same infrastructure. The image processing pipeline and machine learning models are configured to detect various violation types (windshield issues, tire conditions, lighting problems) through a unified system architecture, reducing overall complexity compared to having separate specialized systems for each violation type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11501397B2Method, system and computer program product for automated processing, enforcement and intelligent management of vehicle operation violations
Publication Date: 2022.11.15 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC
  • US11501397B2 patent drawing
  • US11501397B2 patent drawing
  • US11501397B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Automated processing, enforcement and intelligent management of vehicle operation violations is disclosed. A method, that is also disclosed, includes obtaining at least one image within which is shown at least a portion of a vehicle. The method also includes receiving image data for the at least one image, and analyzing the image data to generate a violation score for each of one or more potential vehicle operation violations for the vehicle. When the violation score is in-between an upper violation threshold and a lower consideration threshold, user input is obtained that either affirms or rejects existence of a violation and then, once the user input is obtained, a violation notification is generated only when the user input affirms the existence of the violation. When the violation score is higher than the violation threshold, the violation notification is generated without the user input being obtained.