Vehicle Visibility Determination Using Surrounding Vehicle Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle visibility determination systems struggle to distinguish between low visibility conditions and the presence of attached matter on vehicle windows or lenses, leading to inaccurate assessments of peripheral visibility.

Innovation Solution

A determination device that utilizes both first image information from a vehicle's camera and additional information about the visibility state from surrounding vehicles or environmental data to differentiate between low visibility and attached matter on transparent members like windows, using image recognition rates and visibility standards for accurate differentiation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If image information from vehicle-mounted camera is used to determine visibility, then visibility assessment is obtained, but attached matter on window or lens causes false low visibility determination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisibility determination accuracyVSAvoiddetermination reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a comparison mechanism as an intermediary between the image-based visibility determination and the final result. By comparing image recognition rates with predetermined thresholds and using multiple determination criteria, the system mediates the conflict between detecting actual low visibility and avoiding false positives from attached matter on windows or lenses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by using multiple determination criteria rather than relying solely on image information. It combines image recognition rate analysis with predetermined threshold comparisons and additional determination conditions, applying only the necessary level of verification to distinguish true low visibility from artifacts caused by attached matter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Device complexity

If only image information is used for visibility determination, then the system is simple, but it cannot distinguish between low visibility and attached matter on transparent members

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination system complexityVSAvoidvisibility state discrimination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the visibility determination process into multiple independent evaluation stages. It divides the determination into image recognition rate calculation, threshold comparison, additional determination criteria evaluation, and final synthesis, allowing each segment to contribute to the overall accuracy without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by adding only the necessary additional determination criteria to the basic image-based system. Rather than completely redesigning the system, it supplements the existing image information approach with threshold comparisons and additional evaluation conditions, achieving improved precision with minimal added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If multiple determination criteria are used to improve accuracy, then visibility assessment becomes more precise, but the determination process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisibility determination precisionVSAvoiddetermination process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the multi-criteria determination process into distinct, modular evaluation steps. Each criterion (image recognition rate, threshold comparison, additional determination conditions) is processed as a separate segment, allowing for systematic evaluation and reducing the cognitive load of managing multiple criteria simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the determination process adaptive rather than static. The system dynamically evaluates multiple criteria and synthesizes results based on their relative importance and consistency, allowing the determination process to flexibly adjust to different driving conditions and image quality levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11718151B2Determination device, vehicle control device, determination method and determination program
Publication Date: 2023.08.08 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11718151B2 patent drawing
  • US11718151B2 patent drawing
  • US11718151B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A determination device according to an embodiment of the disclosure includes a vehicle extraction unit that determines whether a predetermined attached matter is on a transparent member of a vehicle, based on first image information that is about a periphery of the vehicle and that is picked up through the transparent member by a camera mounted on the vehicle and second image information that is about a periphery of another vehicle surrounding the vehicle and that is picked up by a camera mounted on the other vehicle.