Vehicle Voice Assistant Error Detection With Behavioral Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing voice assistant systems face issues with incorrect classification of spoken utterances as system-directed or non-system directed, leading to user frustration due to false accepts and false rejects, particularly in environments where manual triggers are impractical.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle system that uses microphones and sensors to detect acoustic and user behavior data, classifying utterances accurately by analyzing subsequent user actions and adjusting classifications based on observed behavior to mitigate errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If voice triggers are used to eliminate manual actions, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision of utterance direction deteriorates due to false accepts and false rejects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehands-free accessVSAvoidutterance classification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors user behavior data (eye tracking, gestures, head position) after an utterance is classified to determine if the classification was correct. This feedback loop allows the system to detect false accepts and false rejects, then apply mitigating adjustments to improve future classification accuracy while maintaining hands-free operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate sensors (eye trackers, gesture detectors, head position sensors) that mediate between the voice utterance and the classification decision. These intermediaries provide additional context about user intent, helping to resolve ambiguities in voice-only classification and reduce false accepts and false rejects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the system processes all acoustic input, then measurement precision is improved, but use of energy increases and device complexity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveutterance detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial processing by initially classifying only utterances that meet certain criteria (e.g., contain wake words, come from expected directions) as system-directed. Full processing is applied only to these candidate utterances, while other acoustic input receives minimal or no processing, reducing energy consumption while maintaining detection accuracy for relevant utterances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The processing pipeline is segmented into multiple stages: initial acoustic event detection, wake word detection, utterance classification, and behavioral verification. Each stage processes only the necessary subset of acoustic input, avoiding full-system processing of all acoustic events and thereby reducing energy usage while preserving detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If wake-up words are required to activate the system, then measurement precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to unnecessary user effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintent recognition accuracyVSAvoiduser interaction simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its activation requirements based on context. In certain situations (e.g., when the vehicle is already in a specific state, or when the user has previously indicated they want hands-free operation), the system can activate without requiring a wake-up word, reducing unnecessary user effort while maintaining accurate intent recognition through contextual analysis and behavioral verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12431129B2Voice assistant error detection system
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 CERENCE OPERATING CO
  • US12431129B2 patent drawing
  • US12431129B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle system for classifying spoken utterance within a vehicle cabin as one of system-directed and non-system directed, the system may include at least one microphone configured to detect at least one acoustic utterance from at least one occupant of a vehicle, at least one sensor to detect user behavior data indicative of user behavior, and a processor programmed to: receive the acoustic utterance, classify the acoustic utterance as one of a system-directed utterance and a non-system directed utterance, determine whether the acoustic utterance was properly classified based on user behavior observed via data received from the sensor after the classification, and apply a mitigating adjustment to classifications of subsequent acoustic utterances based on an improper classification.