Vehicle Component Welding Parameters for Distortion Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current welding systems for vehicle component assemblies lack systematic, automated, and intelligent methods to address dimensional variations and thermal distortions, leading to suboptimal weld quality and increased production costs due to reliance on limited lab trials and human-based finite element analysis.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a machine learning model integrated with finite element analysis and reinforcement learning to predict optimal welding parameters, which scans vehicle components, generates CAD models, and adjusts for manufacturing differences to minimize distortion, controlling the welding process in real-time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated welding systems are used to weld vehicle components, then productivity is improved, but weld distortion increases due to thermal effects and dimensional variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding automationVSAvoidweld distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary scanning of vehicle components to capture actual dimensional data before welding begins. This advance measurement allows the machine learning model to predict optimal welding parameters that account for specific dimensional variations, thereby preventing distortion before it occurs rather than correcting it after welding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts welding parameters (such as welding speed, current, voltage, and sequence) based on predictions from the machine learning model. These parameter changes are optimized for each specific component configuration to minimize thermal distortion while maintaining welding quality and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If traditional lab trials and human-based finite element analysis are used to determine welding parameters, then manufacturing precision may be maintained, but productivity decreases and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweld qualityVSAvoidproduction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces traditional mechanical trial-and-error methods and manual finite element analysis with an automated machine learning model. This intelligent system processes scan data and predicts optimal welding parameters instantaneously, eliminating the need for time-consuming lab trials while maintaining or improving weld quality through data-driven decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model enables the welding system to self-optimize by automatically analyzing component dimensions and determining optimal welding parameters without human intervention. The system learns from data and continuously improves its predictions, allowing rapid production while maintaining high weld quality through autonomous parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If welding parameters are optimized for each specific component configuration, then weld quality is improved, but device complexity increases due to need for scanning and machine learning integration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefirst-time weld qualityVSAvoidsystem integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a universal machine learning model that can handle multiple vehicle component types and configurations through a single integrated platform. The model accepts various scan data formats and outputs optimized welding parameters for different scenarios, eliminating the need for separate systems for each component type and reducing overall complexity despite the advanced capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model serves as an intelligent intermediary between the scanning system and the welding apparatus. It processes complex scan data and translates it into actionable welding parameters, simplifying the integration between measurement and manufacturing systems while enabling high precision through data-driven optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240286232A1Systems and methods for welding vehicle component assemblies
Publication Date: 2024.08.29 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US20240286232A1 patent drawing
  • US20240286232A1 patent drawing
  • US20240286232A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for welding vehicle component assemblies includes a measurement sensor configured to scan first and second vehicle components, a welding apparatus configured to weld the first vehicle component and the second vehicle component together, and at least one processor configured to execute computer-executable instructions to access scan data of the first and second vehicle components, generate a CAD model of an as-scanned assembly of the first and second vehicle components, obtain input parameters associated with one or more features of the first and second vehicle components, generate predicted optimal welding parameters, using the machine learning model, based on CAD model and the input parameters, and control the welding apparatus to perform at least one welding operation on the first and second vehicle components according to the predicted optimal welding parameters.