Autonomous Vehicle Wheel Slippage Detection via Pose Deviation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in detecting and managing wheel slippage due to environmental factors like ice, snow, puddles, grease, oil, or debris, as existing sensor systems lack precision in evaluating traction loss, impacting driving capabilities and safety.

Innovation Solution

The vehicle employs a method to actively or passively test traction conditions by actuating components like braking or acceleration systems, obtaining pose information, comparing actual and expected poses, determining slippage, and performing corrective actions or route re-planning to adjust braking strategies and future driving operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If standard sensor systems are used to detect environmental features, then the vehicle can operate in autonomous mode, but the sensors lack precision to properly evaluate loss of traction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraction detection precisionVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system that uses the vehicle's existing pose estimation infrastructure (already used for navigation and path following) as a mediator to detect wheel slippage. Instead of adding dedicated traction sensors, the system repurposes the relationship between expected vehicle pose (from path planning) and actual vehicle pose (from localization sensors) to infer traction conditions. This intermediary approach leverages existing system components to achieve precise traction detection without directly adding new sensing hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct mechanical or dedicated sensing approaches for traction detection with a computational method. Instead of using mechanical sensors to directly measure wheel-road interaction, the system substitutes a software-based analysis that compares kinematic data (pose, velocity, acceleration) with expected values from path planning algorithms. This substitution transforms a potential hardware complexity problem into a software processing solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If the vehicle actively tests traction by actuating braking or acceleration components, then slippage detection accuracy improves, but energy consumption and wear increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveslippage detection accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption during testing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using small, controlled perturbations in braking or acceleration rather than full-scale tests. The system actuates components just enough to generate detectable pose deviations that indicate slippage, without applying excessive force that would cause significant energy loss or component wear. This partial testing approach achieves sufficient measurement precision while minimizing the adverse effects of active testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs traction testing periodically rather than continuously, actuating braking or acceleration components at intervals to gather slippage data. This periodic approach allows the vehicle to operate normally between tests, reducing overall energy consumption and wear compared to continuous active testing, while still maintaining accurate traction awareness through regular sampling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If the vehicle performs corrective driving actions in response to detected slippage, then safety is maintained, but driving efficiency and speed reduce

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving safetyVSAvoiddriving efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of braking profiles and driving parameters based on real-time slippage detection. Rather than applying fixed, conservative corrections, the system continuously adapts braking force, acceleration rates, and speed targets to current traction conditions. This dynamic approach maintains safety by responding appropriately to actual slippage events while preserving driving efficiency during normal conditions with good traction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop where detected slippage information is fed back to the path planning and control systems. This feedback enables the vehicle to adjust its driving behavior intelligently - applying corrective actions only when and where slippage is detected, rather than uniformly reducing efficiency across all driving segments. The feedback mechanism allows the vehicle to maintain high productivity on good road sections while ensuring safety on slippery sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10940851B2Determining wheel slippage on self driving vehicle
Publication Date: 2021.03.09 WAYMO LLC
  • US10940851B2 patent drawing
  • US10940851B2 patent drawing
  • US10940851B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The technology relates to determining the current state of friction that a vehicle's wheels have with the road surface. This may be done via active or passive testing or other monitoring while the vehicles operates in an autonomous mode. In response to detecting the loss of traction, the vehicle's control system is able to use the resultant information to select an appropriate braking level or braking strategy. This may be done for both immediate driving operations and planning future portions of an ongoing trip. For instance, the on-board system is able to evaluate appropriate conditions and situations for active testing or passive evaluation of traction through autonomous braking and/or acceleration operations. The on-board computer system may share slippage and other road condition information with nearby vehicles and with remote assistance, so that it may be employed with broader fleet planning operations.