Vehicle Zonal Architecture for Secure, Lower-Complexity Communications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicles face high design costs and security risks due to extensive networks with varying security capabilities and overlapping communication paths, making network design, integration, and updating complex and difficult.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a zonal architecture that organizes networks based on physical location rather than function, reducing hardware requirements and enhancing security by using a service-oriented architecture with dynamic configuration and policy management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If networks are organized around particular vehicle functions with multiple connection paths, then communication capability is improved, but hardware requirements and design costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication capabilityVSAvoidhardware requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the vehicle network into multiple zones based on physical location rather than function. Each zone contains ECUs and network infrastructure locally, segmenting the overall network architecture. This reduces the need for extensive cross-vehicle wiring while maintaining communication capability through zone-to-zone connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces zone gateways as intermediary devices that facilitate communication between different zones. These gateways act as mediators that route messages between zones, replacing the need for direct point-to-point connections between all ECUs and reducing overall hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple networks with varying security capabilities are implemented, then functional requirements are met, but security risks increase due to multiple access points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional requirementsVSAvoidsecurity risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the network into isolated zones with controlled access points. Each zone can have its own security policy, and the zone gateway enforces security boundaries. This segmentation limits the attack surface compared to a fully interconnected functional network, as compromised ECUs in one zone cannot directly access ECUs in other zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different security policies and capabilities to different zones based on their specific requirements. Critical zones can have higher security measures while less critical zones use simpler protocols. This localized approach to security allows functional diversity while managing overall security risk through zone isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If extensive networks with overlapping communication paths are used, then communication redundancy is improved, but network design and updating become complex and difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication redundancyVSAvoidnetwork design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent organizes the network into discrete zones with defined boundaries and communication protocols. This segmentation simplifies network design by providing a modular structure where each zone can be independently configured and updated. Redundancy is achieved through standardized zone gateway interfaces rather than complex overlapping paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universal communication protocols and standardized interfaces at zone gateways that enable multiple zones to communicate through common rules. This universality simplifies network design by providing a consistent framework for communication across all zones, reducing the need for custom point-to-point configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Stability of the object's composition

If traditional functional network architecture is maintained, then existing communication paths work, but reconfiguration requires downtime and complex changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexisting communication pathsVSAvoidreconfiguration capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic route selection and message routing through zone gateways that can adapt communication paths in real-time. ECUs can be added, removed, or moved between zones without requiring system shutdown, as the zone gateway architecture provides flexible routing that automatically adjusts to configuration changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent allows configuration changes to be prepared and validated before implementation. Zone gateways can pre-establish communication paths and buffer messages during transitions, enabling reconfiguration without interrupting ongoing communications. This preliminary preparation ensures stability during transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12395406B2System, method, and apparatus to execute vehicle communications using a zonal architecture
Publication Date: 2025.08.19 SONATUS INC
  • US12395406B2 patent drawing
  • US12395406B2 patent drawing
  • US12395406B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example method including interpreting a vehicle network performance description; determining a zonal architecture value in response to the vehicle network performance description and a vehicle performance network impact description; and integrating a multi-zone network on a vehicle in response to the zonal architecture value.