Vehicular 3D Object Detection via Feature Point Motion Analysis
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional obstacle detection systems in vehicles rely on expensive and time-consuming processes requiring specific classifiers for object detection, which are not generic enough to handle various real-world objects and consume significant computational resources.
Innovation Solution
A method utilizing relative motion between the vehicle and its environment to differentiate between three-dimensional objects and two-dimensional features like shadows or pavement markings, employing a single image sensor and edge-based features to estimate object relevance and potential obstacles.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If conventional classifier-based object detection is used, then detection accuracy for predefined objects is improved, but device complexity and computational resources increase significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts only the essential motion characteristic (vertical displacement of spaced-apart points) from the complex object detection problem. Instead of using comprehensive classifiers that analyze multiple object features, the invention isolates and utilizes solely the differential motion pattern to distinguish 3D objects from 2D features, dramatically simplifying the detection system while maintaining effectiveness
Solution Approach 2:
The patent creates a universal detection mechanism that works for all types of objects (pedestrians, vehicles, animals, etc.) without requiring object-specific classifiers. The single principle of analyzing vertical motion of spaced-apart points applies universally to any 3D object, eliminating the need for extensive classifier training and making the system adaptable to any object type encountered in the environment
2Adaptability or versatility
If extensive classifier training is performed for all possible objects, then detection coverage is improved, but time consumption and computational cost increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent enables the system to automatically distinguish 3D objects from 2D features using intrinsic motion characteristics without requiring external training data or manual classifier development. The system serves itself by utilizing the natural differential motion that occurs when the vehicle moves, eliminating the need for time-consuming classifier training processes while maintaining broad adaptability to all object types
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the detection parameter from static object classification (requiring training) to dynamic motion analysis. By monitoring how spaced-apart points move vertically during vehicle traversal, the system adapts to any object type without retraining, as the motion-based parameter naturally varies with object depth and geometry
3Reliability
If multiple classifiers are deployed for different object types, then detection comprehensiveness is improved, but computational resources and processing power increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts only the critical motion parameter (vertical displacement of point pairs) needed for reliable obstacle detection, discarding the need for multiple energy-intensive classifiers. This extraction maintains detection reliability by focusing on the fundamental characteristic that distinguishes 3D obstacles from 2D features while dramatically reducing computational energy requirements
Data Source
AI summary
A method of distinguishing a three dimensional object from a two dimensional object using a vehicular system includes acquiring image frames captured by a vehicle camera while the vehicle is in motion. First and second feature points are selected from a first detected object in a first captured image frame and tracked in at least a second captured image frame. Third and fourth feature points are selected from a second detected object in the first captured image frame and tracked over at least the second captured image frame. Movements of the first and second feature points over the multiple captured image frames are compared to movements of the third and fourth feature points the multiple captured image frames to distinguish the first object as a three dimensional object and the second object as a two dimensional object.