Vehicular Driving Score System for Reckless Incident Reporting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drivers have no effective means to report reckless driving behavior, which endangers others on the road, despite it being in their best interest to do so, due to the lack of suitable reporting mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A vehicular communication system that assigns a driving score to vehicles based on reported reckless incidents, incrementing scores for each incident and decrementing them over time, with scores broadcasted to neighboring vehicles and optionally a central server, using V2V communication and secure computing units to manage and secure the scoring process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If drivers report reckless driving incidents through a centralized system, then the ability to report and track reckless behavior improves, but the system complexity and cost of centralized infrastructure increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereckless driving reporting capabilityVSAvoidcentralized system infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the centralized reporting system into distributed peer-to-peer communications between vehicles. Each vehicle independently maintains and shares reckless driving incident data with nearby vehicles through V2V communication, eliminating the need for a centralized server infrastructure while maintaining reliable reporting capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables vehicles to autonomously report, store, and share reckless driving incident data without requiring centralized management. Each vehicle acts as both client and server, self-managing the reputation data in its vicinity through decentralized peer-to-peer interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If driving reputation data is stored centrally on a server, then data accessibility and analysis capability improve, but the vulnerability to tampering and security breaches increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereputation data accessibilityVSAvoiddata integrity against tampering
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the centralized data storage into distributed storage across multiple vehicles. Each vehicle stores reputation data locally and shares it with nearby vehicles, creating redundant copies throughout the network. This distribution prevents single-point failures and tampering while maintaining data accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements local data storage and validation at each vehicle, where reputation scores are maintained and verified by multiple neighboring vehicles independently. This local validation mechanism enhances data integrity without requiring centralized verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Loss of information

If continuous monitoring and broadcasting of driving scores is implemented, then real-time safety information availability improves, but the network energy consumption and data traffic increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time safety informationVSAvoidnetwork communication energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic broadcasting of driving scores at predetermined intervals rather than continuous real-time transmission. This approach maintains adequate information availability for safety purposes while significantly reducing network energy consumption and data traffic compared to continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Reliability

If a decentralized peer-to-peer communication system is used, then system robustness and resistance to tampering improve, but the complexity of managing distributed data consistency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem robustnessVSAvoiddistributed data management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where vehicles continuously exchange and compare reputation data with neighboring vehicles. This feedback loop naturally resolves data inconsistencies through multiple independent verification paths, maintaining data consistency without complex centralized coordination protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20170270788A1Methods and systems for increasing vehicular safety
Publication Date: 2017.09.21 CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20170270788A1 patent drawing
  • US20170270788A1 patent drawing
  • US20170270788A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, system and apparatus are described, the method, system, and apparatus, in one embodiment including assigning at a processor an initial driving score S(V) to a vehicle which is being driven, receiving a report at a communication system controlled by the processor, the report including a report of a reckless driving incident in a vicinity of a receiver disposed in the vehicle, incrementing S(V) by the processor upon receipt of the report of the reckless driving incident, decreasing S(V) by the processor for every unit of driving the vehicle is driven, broadcasting the value of S(V) to other vehicles by the communication system controlled by the processor. Related methods, systems and apparatuses are also described.