Vehicular Image Processing Combining Camera Views for Obstacle Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional camera systems for vehicle obstacle detection struggle to effectively capture and detect objects at short distances due to limited field of view and installation constraints, leading to decreased detection rates and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A vehicular image processing apparatus and system that combine images from multiple cameras with overlapping fields of view, using projective transformation to synthesize a continuous image, enabling detection of obstacles that are not entirely within a single camera's view.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a monocular camera with narrow angle of view is used to detect distant obstacles, then detection accuracy for distant objects is improved, but the feet of obstacles at short distance cannot be captured within the angle of view

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracy for distant obstaclesVSAvoidangle of view coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the detection task into two segments: a monocular camera for distant obstacle detection and a downward-facing camera for short-distance obstacle detection. Each camera is optimized for its specific detection range, with the monocular camera capturing the upper body of distant objects and the downward-facing camera capturing the feet/lower body of short-distance objects. This segmentation allows both detection accuracy for distant objects and coverage for short-distance objects to be improved simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Area of stationary object

If a wide-angle camera is used to capture a wide area, then coverage of the ground in wide range is improved, but the feet of objects at short distance are not seen due to bonnet projection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephotographing area coverageVSAvoiddetection accuracy for short-distance objects
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a new spatial dimension by mounting a camera on the downward-facing side of the vehicle (below the bonnet level). This downward-facing camera captures the ground area in front of the bonnet that is occluded from the perspective of forward-facing cameras. By adding this new viewing angle/dimension, the system achieves both wide coverage and accurate detection of short-distance objects' feet without being blocked by the bonnet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If a compound-eye camera is used for distance measurement, then distance measurement capability is improved, but the feet of objects at short distance cannot be captured and template matching detection rate decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistance measurement accuracyVSAvoiddetection rate for short-distance objects
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the outputs of two separate camera systems: the compound-eye camera provides distance measurement information for obstacles, while the downward-facing camera provides visual confirmation of the obstacle's feet/lower body. By combining these two data sources, the system achieves both accurate distance measurement and reliable detection of short-distance objects, overcoming the limitation where template matching fails due to missing visual information about the obstacle's feet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Area of stationary object

If cameras are mounted on the outer side of the vehicle for parking assistance, then wide-angle ground coverage is improved, but obstacles at short distance are difficult to detect correctly since only feet are captured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveground photographing areaVSAvoidobstacle detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the obstacle detection function between two camera types: downward-facing cameras mounted on the outer side for capturing wide-angle ground views and detecting the feet of obstacles, and monocular cameras for capturing the upper body of obstacles. By segmenting the detection task and combining results from both camera systems, the system achieves both wide ground coverage and accurate obstacle detection, resolving the contradiction between coverage and detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10183621B2Vehicular image processing apparatus and vehicular image processing system
Publication Date: 2019.01.22 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US10183621B2 patent drawing
  • US10183621B2 patent drawing
  • US10183621B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicular image processing system and a vehicular image processing apparatus are provided which combine an image from a photographing device for detection of an object forward of a vehicle and an image from a photographing device for parking assistance, thereby enabling detection, in a synthesized image, of an obstacle of which the entirety cannot be captured by each photographing device since the object is located in a region where detection is difficult in the conventional art, for example, the object is located at a short distance from the own-vehicle.