Vehicular seat back frame structure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing vehicular seatback frame structures with closed cross-sectional structures are over-engineered, leading to increased weight and potential separation issues at bonded sections due to adhesive agent limitations, and pose challenges in productivity and material cost due to complex shapes and large adhesive coating areas.

Innovation Solution

A vehicular seatback frame structure featuring two resin side frames with an upper cross member formed by a first member with a downward opening part and a second member with an upward opening part, positioned to create a closed cross-sectional structure, where the joining parts are strategically located to reduce stress concentration and adhesive usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a closed cross-sectional structure is formed by bonding two members with adhesive agent, then the rigidity and strength of the seatback frame are improved, but the bonding section may separate under collision loads due to adhesive strength limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrength of upper cross memberVSAvoidbonding reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The first member and second member are integrally formed as a single piece, eliminating the adhesive bonding interface between them. This merging of components removes the weak bonding section that could separate under load, while the integral construction maintains the closed cross-sectional structure for required rigidity and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The upper cross member is divided into two functional parts (first member and second member) that are positioned to form a closed cross-sectional structure, but manufactured as one integral component. This segmentation allows optimization of each part's geometry while avoiding the bonding reliability issue through integral construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If all seatback frame components are formed with closed cross-sectional structure, then the rigidity is improved, but the weight increases due to overspecification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverigidity of seatback frameVSAvoidweight of seatback frame
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The closed cross-sectional structure is applied locally only to the upper cross member where high rigidity is required for collision resistance, while other seatback frame components can use lighter open cross-sectional structures. This localized application of the closed structure avoids unnecessary weight increase in areas where high rigidity is not critical.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If the headrest supporting section is formed in a complicated shape, then the functional requirements are met, but the degree of difficulty in forming increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheadrest support functionalityVSAvoidmanufacturing productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex headrest supporting section geometry is built-in during the integral molding process of the first and second members, rather than requiring subsequent complex assembly or joining operations. This preliminary formation of the complicated shape in a single manufacturing step maintains productivity while achieving the required headrest support functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Strength

If outer frame member and inner frame member are bonded by adhesive agent, then the closed cross-sectional structure is formed, but the coated area and coating amount of adhesive agent increase, deteriorating workability and increasing material cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrity of closed cross-sectionVSAvoidworkability of adhesive coating
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The outer frame member and inner frame member are merged into a single integral component (first member and second member), eliminating the need for adhesive bonding between them. This removes the workability issues associated with large-area adhesive coating while maintaining the structural integrity of the closed cross-sectional configuration through integral construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP3575145B1Vehicular seat back frame structure
Publication Date: 2021.03.24 SUZUKI MOTOR CORP
  • EP3575145B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3575145B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3575145B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Separation of a joining in a joining part of a closed cross-sectional structure of an upper cross member is suppressed and the rigidity of the upper cross member is ensured. A vehicular seatback frame structure is provided with resin side frames (21, 22), and an upper cross member (30) bridged over between upper parts of the side frames (21, 22). The upper cross member (30) includes a first member (31), and a second member (32) disposed under the first member (31). An opening part is provided in a lower part of the first member (31), the first member (31) has a traverse cross-sectional shape opening to the downward side, an opening part is provided in an upper part of the second member (32), and the second member (32) has a traverse cross-sectional shape opening to the upward side. The opening part of the first member (31) and the opening part of the second member (32) are bonded in a state of facing each other to form a closed cross-sectional structure.