Vendor-Agnostic Inference Appliance for Unified Screening AI

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing screening technologies in high-throughput, secure environments suffer from duplication of computational resources, obsolescent infrastructure, lack of interconnection between elements, slower screening, increased labor requirements, and reduced detection efficiency due to the use of multiple vendor-specific devices with disparate software and hardware.

Innovation Solution

A vendor-agnostic interconnection system that integrates multiple vendor software packages, providing a unified dataset and image format for analysis, using a high-performance appliance with GPU-based AI inferencing and failover capabilities, allowing rapid updates and integration of new technologies without re-certification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple vendor-specific screening devices and software packages are used in parallel, then diverse screening capabilities are achieved, but device complexity and lack of interconnection increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreening capabilitiesVSAvoidsystem interconnection
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a central server as an intermediary component that receives data from multiple vendor-specific screening devices and processes them through a unified AI algorithm. This mediator enables interconnection between disparate devices without requiring direct integration between them, reducing system complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a universal AI algorithm hosted on a central server that can process data from various types of screening devices regardless of vendor. This multi-functional approach allows a single algorithm to handle diverse screening data formats and protocols, eliminating the need for vendor-specific processing for each device type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If stand-alone screening devices from multiple vendors are deployed, then screening coverage is comprehensive, but productivity and screening speed decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreening coverageVSAvoidscreening speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the computational resources of multiple stand-alone devices by consolidating AI processing on a central server. This combination allows parallel processing of data from multiple devices simultaneously, increasing overall screening throughput and speed while maintaining comprehensive coverage through the integration of various device types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If vendor-specific software packages are used for each screening device, then device functionality is optimized, but adaptability to new technologies and threats is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice functionalityVSAvoidflexibility to new technologies
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the AI algorithm from the vendor-specific device software and hosts it independently on a central server. This separation allows the core algorithm to be updated, modified, or replaced without affecting the underlying screening devices. New algorithms can be deployed to address emerging threats while maintaining reliable device operation through the stable data collection and transmission infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If computational resources are duplicated across multiple devices, then device independence is maintained, but loss of time and computational efficiency worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice independenceVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of duplicating full computational resources on each device, the system creates a copy of the AI algorithm on a central server that serves all devices. This centralized copy eliminates redundant computational resources while maintaining the functional independence of each screening device, as each can still operate autonomously for data collection and transmission while sharing the common AI processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12620486B2System and method for high performance, vendor-agnostic inference appliance
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 ANALYTICAL AI INC
  • US12620486B2 patent drawing
  • US12620486B2 patent drawing
  • US12620486B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Urgent screening in high-throughput, secure environments such as emergency rooms, or security, typically involves multiple devices. Devices that are used for screening are diverse, and typically sourced from multiple vendors. Currently, devices are typically stand-alone. Further, large devices, are costly, having high capital expenses with long commercial lifetimes, sometimes approaching a decade or more. The result of these features leads to duplication of computational resources, obsolescent computational infrastructure, and lack of interconnection between elements. Aspects of this invention include a device, system, and methods to provide vendor-agnostic interconnection between the multiple elements of a defined environment. The disclosed approach untethers AI algorithms from data generation system and increases flexibility in deployment of newer technologies and algorithms. Example systems can be updated or replaced with new hardware, as computational capabilities develop on short or emergent quality improvement cycles, and can adapt nimbly to changes in threats, regulatory requirements or market developments.