Vendor Security Assessment Questionnaire Mapping System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The process of conducting vendor security assessments is laborious and time-consuming due to the wide variation in vendor security assessment questionnaires, which often require manual handling and lack alignment with industry standards, leading to inefficiencies in exchanging information.

Innovation Solution

A system that maps ad-hoc vendor security assessment questionnaires to standardized cybersecurity frameworks, providing suggested matches and auto-populating responses based on similarity, allowing for the creation of a question bank and generation of security profiles for easy sharing and compliance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual handling of vendor security assessment questionnaires is used, then flexibility in handling diverse questionnaires is maintained, but time and effort required for completion increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequestionnaire completion efficiencyVSAvoidtime required for vendor security assessments
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-mapping questionnaire questions to security controls and pre-populating responses based on existing security program data before the actual assessment is needed. This allows vendors to have security information ready in advance, eliminating the need for manual compilation during the assessment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of security control information and maps them to multiple questionnaire formats. Once security controls are defined once, they can be copied and adapted to different questionnaire templates (SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST, etc.), eliminating redundant manual work across different assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If standardized frameworks are adopted for all vendor assessments, then consistency and alignment with industry standards improve, but adaptability to specific vendor needs and unique assessment requirements decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment with industry standardsVSAvoidadaptability to specific assessment requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal security control framework that can serve multiple questionnaire types and assessment standards simultaneously. The core security controls are designed to be framework-agnostic, allowing the same security program to satisfy multiple standards (SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST, etc.) through adaptive mapping rather than requiring separate implementations for each standard.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows dynamic adjustment of mapping parameters between security controls and questionnaire questions. The mapping relationships can be configured and modified based on specific assessment requirements, enabling the same core framework to adapt to different standards and vendor-specific needs through parameter configuration rather than structural changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive security information is collected for all vendors, then assessment accuracy and completeness improve, but complexity of information management and processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment accuracyVSAvoidinformation management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments security information into distinct control categories and hierarchical levels (organizational, technological, operational controls). This segmentation allows information to be organized in manageable units that can be independently mapped to specific questionnaire questions, reducing the complexity of managing comprehensive security information while maintaining assessment completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11610213B2Systems and methods for proactively responding to vendor security assessments
Publication Date: 2023.03.21 WHISTIC INC
  • US11610213B2 patent drawing
  • US11610213B2 patent drawing
  • US11610213B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems to establish a security profile may include a memory to store original text from security questionnaires, and values associated with the original text from the questionnaires, the values indicating a section, a control, or a question of the original text. The system may also include a processing unit. The processing unit can identify a set of latent topics present in the original text from the stored security questionnaires, score the original text based on presence or absence of latent topics, receive a new security questionnaire, score the new text from the new security questionnaire based on presence or absence of latent topics, compute a distance between the scored original text from the stored security questionnaires and the scored new text from the new security questionnaire, and link the original text to the new text with a smallest distance between.