Vented Mold Groove Network for Foam Gas Venting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional mold venting techniques for producing polyurethane foam articles often result in defects such as foam collapse, voids, and underfill due to inadequate or excessive venting, leading to material wastage and increased production costs.

Innovation Solution

The use of grooves or slots on the mold cavity surface, arranged in a network or grid-like fashion, acts as a siphon to effectively draw and channel gases away from the expanding foam to fewer strategically placed vents, reducing the need for numerous vents and minimizing material wastage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional drilled or cut vent passages are used in the mold, then gas can escape from the mold cavity, but excessive venting causes foam collapse and material wastage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveventing effectivenessVSAvoidmaterial wastage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The mold cavity surface is segmented into multiple regions, each equipped with its own groove and vent system. This allows localized control of gas escape in different areas of the mold, preventing excessive venting in any single region while maintaining overall venting effectiveness throughout the cavity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the mold cavity are provided with grooves of varying dimensions and configurations based on local requirements. The groove depth, width, and orientation are optimized for specific areas, allowing precise control over gas flow and foam expansion characteristics in each region while minimizing material wastage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If multiple vents are added to various locations to improve venting, then gas escape is enhanced, but the complexity of the mold increases and material wastage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveventing adequacyVSAvoidmold complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple groove systems that would traditionally require separate vent passages are merged into integrated groove networks on the mold cavity surface. These interconnected grooves channel gas flow efficiently to strategically positioned vents, reducing the total number of vent openings needed while maintaining adequate venting across all mold regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The groove structures serve multiple functions simultaneously: they act as gas channels, define foam expansion patterns, and can be configured to accommodate different product geometries. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional specialized venting components, simplifying the overall mold design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If more vents are provided to prevent foam collapse, then gas escape improves, but the number of vents and associated costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoam qualityVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The groove patterns are pre-configured on the mold cavity surface to anticipate and guide gas flow paths before foam expansion begins. This preliminary structuring of gas channels ensures that gas is efficiently directed to appropriate escape routes during the foaming process, preventing defects without requiring excessive vent openings that would reduce production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces the occurrence of foam collapse, voids, and underfill, allowing for the production of lighter, high-quality foam articles with reduced venting needs, lower capital and maintenance costs, and improved process predictability.

Implementation Method 1

The use of grooves or slots on the mold cavity surface, arranged in a network or grid-like fashion, acts as a siphon to effectively draw and channel gases away from the expanding foam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Implementation Method 2

the at least one vent comprising a passageway for gas to escape from the mold cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas pressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS7481637B2Vented mold and method for producing molded article
Publication Date: 2009.01.27 PROPRIETECT LP
  • US7481637B2 patent drawing
  • US7481637B2 patent drawing
  • US7481637B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates mold, particularly a mold for producing foam articles. In a preferred embodiment, the mold comprises a lid and a bowl releasingly engageable to define a mold cavity, the lid comprising: (i) a vent having a passageway for gas to escape from the mold cavity, and (ii) a plurality of grooves connected to the vent. The use of a plurality of grooves/slots in the mold cavity surface effectively acts as a siphon to draw gas away from the composition to be molded. The plurality of grooves/slots is connected to one or more vents which then allows for escape of the gas from the mold cavity to the exterior of the mold.