Ventilation Channel Shutter for Aerodynamic Drag Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-performance cars face a compromise between ensuring adequate engine cooling at low speeds and minimizing aerodynamic drag at high speeds due to the size of the ventilation channel inlet opening, with existing solutions failing to optimize both requirements simultaneously.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a car design featuring a ventilation channel with a shutter-controlled aerodynamic duct that automatically opens at high speeds, reducing aerodynamic load and drag by allowing air to flow through a duct within the front bumper, while maintaining adequate airflow for cooling at low speeds through strategically positioned aerodynamic ducts and shutters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the inlet opening of the ventilation channel is made large to guarantee adequate air flow rate for engine cooling at low speed, then the cooling capacity is improved, but the aerodynamic drag increases and maximum speed is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair flow rateVSAvoidaerodynamic drag
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a movable shutter (element 30) in the inlet opening of the ventilation channel that can dynamically adjust its position based on driving conditions. At low speeds, the shutter remains open to maximize air flow rate for adequate engine cooling. At high speeds, the shutter automatically closes to reduce aerodynamic drag and minimize air flow through the ventilation channel, thereby resolving the contradiction between cooling requirements and drag reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the inlet opening of the ventilation channel is made small to minimize aerodynamic drag at high speed, then the aerodynamic performance is improved, but the air flow rate decreases and engine cooling becomes inadequate at low speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic dragVSAvoidair flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The movable shutter (element 30) enables dynamic adjustment of the inlet opening size. When driving at high speeds where aerodynamic drag is the primary concern, the shutter closes to minimize the effective inlet area, reducing drag while maintaining adequate cooling through the controlled air flow path. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by allowing the system to optimize for drag reduction when needed without permanently sacrificing cooling capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If a shutter is added to the inlet opening to control air flow dynamically, then both low-speed cooling and high-speed drag reduction can be achieved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair flow controlVSAvoidshutter mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shutter mechanism is designed to operate automatically based on aerodynamic forces and pressure differentials that naturally occur during vehicle operation. The shutter opens at low speeds when adequate air flow is needed for cooling and closes at high speeds when drag reduction is prioritized, without requiring complex electronic sensors, actuators, or control systems. This self-regulating approach provides adaptable air flow control while minimizing the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design achieves optimal steering sensation and balanced aerodynamic load at all speeds, reducing forward aerodynamic drag and ensuring proper airflow for cooling, without increasing weight or production complexity.

Implementation Method 1

a shutter (19) which is mounted mobile between an engagement position, in which the shutter (19) closes the inlet opening (17) of the aerodynamic duct (16), and a disengagement position, in which the shutter (19) leaves the inlet opening (17) free

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic pressure: Drag

Implementation Method 2

reducing forward aerodynamic drag and ensuring proper airflow for cooling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag reduction: Drag

Implementation Method 3

a cooling circuit having at least one radiator to release the excess heat to the outside. The cooling circuit radiator is normally arranged inside a ventilation channel which extends between an inlet opening (or an air intake) through which fresh air flows in and an outlet opening through which hot air flows out

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection cooling: Convection

Data Source

PatentEP2837517B1Car provided with a ventilation channel
Publication Date: 2016.01.06 FERRARI SPA
  • EP2837517B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2837517B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2837517B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

Car (1) provided with: at least one radiator (10); a ventilation channel (11) which houses on the inside the radiator (10); an aerodynamic duct (22), which extends between an inlet opening (23) and an outlet opening (24) obtained inside the ventilation channel (11) between the inlet opening (12) of the ventilation channel (11) and the radiator (10); and a shutter (25), which is arranged in the area of the inlet opening (23) of the aerodynamic duct (22) and is mounted mobile between an engagement position, in which the shutter (25) closes the inlet opening (23) of the aerodynamic duct (22), and a disengagement position, in which the shutter (25) leaves the inlet opening (23) of the aerodynamic duct (22) free.