Ventilator APRV Parameter Control for Lung Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current ventilator systems face challenges in accurately and automatically configuring Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV) parameters to respond to individual patient needs, leading to suboptimal lung protection and increased risk of ventilator-induced lung injury.

Innovation Solution

A ventilator system with a computerized controller that includes sensors and a user interface for real-time data monitoring and automated adjustments of APRV parameters, allowing for precise control of pressure, volume, and flow rates, and the ability to switch between ventilation modes based on patient response.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional volume and pressure cycled ventilation is used, then ventilation can be provided to patients with respiratory failure, but airway pressures are elevated (30-40% higher than APRV) increasing the risk of ventilator induced lung injury

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveventilation effectivenessVSAvoidairway pressure elevation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The ventilator dynamically switches between two distinct ventilation modes (APRV and conventional volume/pressure cycled ventilation) based on patient condition and treatment phase. The system allows real-time transition between modes, enabling optimization of airway pressure management while maintaining effective ventilation support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key ventilation parameters including airway pressure levels, tidal volume, and respiratory frequency between different ventilation modes. Specifically, APRV mode utilizes lower peak airway pressures compared to conventional ventilation, thereby reducing the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury while maintaining adequate gas exchange.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If APRV mode is used to reduce airway pressures and prevent lung injury, then ventilator induced lung injury risk is decreased, but automated configuration and response to individual patient needs is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveventilator induced lung injury riskVSAvoidautomated parameter configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The ventilator incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor patient response to ventilation and automatically adjust APRV parameters. The system responds to individual patient needs by modifying pressure levels, timing, and other parameters based on observed physiological responses, thereby enhancing the automated configuration capability while maintaining lung protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The ventilator system performs self-adjustment of ventilation parameters through automated algorithms that configure APRV settings based on patient characteristics and real-time monitoring data. This self-service capability reduces manual intervention requirements while optimizing lung-protective ventilation delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Object-affected harmful factors

If tidal volume is reduced to limit over distension, then lung over distension is prevented, but alveolar hypoventilation and elevated carbon dioxide levels occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelung over distensionVSAvoidalveolar ventilation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The ventilator dynamically adjusts respiratory frequency and tidal volume based on the selected ventilation mode and patient response. In APRV mode, the system maintains adequate alveolar ventilation by optimizing the balance between pressure support and respiratory rate, preventing both over-distension and hypoventilation through real-time parameter modulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Quantity of substance

If respiratory frequency is increased to compensate for reduced tidal volume, then alveolar hypoventilation is avoided, but lung injury increases and inspiratory time decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealveolar ventilationVSAvoidlung injury
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The ventilator optimizes the combination of respiratory frequency, tidal volume, and inspiratory time parameters based on the selected ventilation mode. APRV mode allows the system to maintain adequate alveolar ventilation through coordinated parameter adjustments that prevent excessive respiratory rates, thereby avoiding the associated lung injury while ensuring sufficient gas exchange.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2611485B1Ventilator apparatus and system for ventilation
Publication Date: 2021.11.10 HABASHI NADER M
  • EP2611485B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2611485B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2611485B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

A ventilator (10) for use by a clinician in supporting a patient presenting pulmonary distress. A controller module (20) with a touch-screen display (26) operates a positive or negative pressure gas source (40) that communicates with the intubated or negative pressure configured patient through valved (46) supply and exhaust ports (42, 44). A variety of peripheral, central, and or supply/exhaust port positioned sensors (54) may be included to measure pressure, volumetric flow rate, gas concentration, transducer, and chest wall breathing work. Innovative modules and routines (30) are incorporated into the controller module enabling hybrid, self-adjusting ventilation protocols and models that are compatible with nearly every conceivable known, contemplated, and prospective technique, and which establish rigorous controls configured to rapidly adapt to even small patient responses with great precision so as to maximize ventilation and recruitment while minimizing risks of injury, atelectasis, and prolonged ventilator days.